T or F with reasoning please if possible ! T/F: The expected runtime of .add( )
ID: 3607266 • Letter: T
Question
T or F with reasoning please if possible !
T/F: The expected runtime of .add( ) for a HashTable depends on which collision-handling scheme is used
• T/F: The expected runtime of .add( ) for a HashTable depends on the current load factor of the hash table
• T/F: The expected runtime of .remove( ) for a HashTable depends on which collision-handling scheme is used
• T/F: The expected runtime of .remove( ) for a HashTable depends on the current load factor of the hash table
• T/F: The expected runtime of .contains( ) for a HashTable is always O(1) regardless of which collision-handling scheme is used
Explanation / Answer
The expected runtime of .add( ) for a HashTable depends on which collision-handling scheme is used
YES this statement is true.
The expected runtime of .add( ) for a HashTable depends on the current load factor of the hash table.
No this statement is FALSE.
The expected runtime of .remove( ) for a HashTable depends on which collision-handling scheme is used.
No this statement is FALSE.
The expected runtime of .remove( ) for a HashTable depends on the current load factor of the hash table
YES this statement is true.
The expected runtime of .contains( ) for a HashTable is always O(1) regardless of which collision-handling scheme is used
YES this statement is true.
Have a great Day.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.