Search the internet and find the case The Supreme Court of the United States cas

Question

Search the internet and find the case The Supreme Court of the United States case of Griggs v. Duke Power Company (1971). Analyze and present a summary of the case. When preparing the summary make sure you answer the following questions:

Why was the case brought? Give a summary of the factors that led to the case.

What three factors were laid out by Chief Justice Burger as affecting equal employment legislation?

What is the relevance of this case to Human Resource Management? Give an example.

Did you agree or disagree with the outcome of the case and why?

https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/124

Explanation / Answer

Summary of the Facts that led to Case

Duke Power Company was one of the public utility corporations in the field of creation, transmission, supply and sales of electric power. The Dan River power plant of Duke Power Company had a policy in 1950s that the blacks can only work in the labor department. The labor department consists of positions in the company which were lowest paid. In 1955, a new requirement was added for the higher paid jobs adding the need of a high school diploma. The company also designed a standard general test for transfer to new jobs. This led to the case.

Three factors laid out by Chief Justice Burger

The following three factors were brought into light by Chief Justice Burger:

Relevance of the Case to Human Resource Management

The Griggs v. Duke Power emerged as a powerful case in the Human Resource Management and created a powerful framework “disparate impact”. This has proved to be essential in fighting against barriers to equal employment opportunities for every individual, irrespective of their gender, race, culture, etc. The example to this can be seen as it promoted a multicultural environment without distinction which exists in current world.

I agree with the outcomes of the case as I personally feel that there should be no discrimination among people. All individuals should be equally treated and in employment equal opportunities must be given to them.

References

Bernhardt, H. N. (1971). Giggs v. Duke Powers Co.: The Implications for Private and Public Employers. Tex. L. Rev., 50, 901.

Wilson, H. S. (1972). A Second Look at Griggs v. Duke Power Company: Ruminations on Job Testing, Discrimination, and the Role of the Federal Courts. Virginia Law Review, 844-874.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.