Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

approximately 300 words, please answer the following question(s): Please summari

ID: 3525230 • Letter: A

Question

approximately 300 words, please answer the following question(s): Please summarize and briefly explain Singer's argument for morally obligated famine relief. According to Singer, why are the affluent nations of the world morally required to provide aid to the poorer nations of the world? What is the primary moral principle that Singer uses to justify his reasoning? Are there any worries/difficulties that Singer’s position seem to face? If so, what are they and how might Singer respond to those worries/difficulties?

Explanation / Answer

step-1

Famine, affluence , and morality is an eassy written by Peter singer in 1971 .Peter singer argued that if one can use wealth , to reducing suffering , for example, by aiding , famine relief efforts ,- without significant reduction in the well being of one self or other .it is immoral not to do so.he argued that suffering and death for lack of food and shelter , medical are bad . He have seen miserable condition of Bangladesh people. If our power prevent ourself from something bad without morally compromise then we should ought to do it.it is no morally Difference to helps someone without any geographical disparities.

step-2

In the world of Globalization, liberalisation, industrilization many rich countries explore and developed widely.But still many country are under poor condition and million of people struggle with malnutrition and starvation and fullfilled of basic needs like south Africa , Bangladesh.so singer Peter has stated morally rich and develop country like U.S.A , U.K should extent their helping hands to uplift poor condition of under develop countries.the aids of these country also helps to meet the international target of 0.07% Gross national income.Besides , it is moral duty and responsibilities to provide all round assistance to poor country for leading quality life . Because everyone deserve it.

step-3

The primary moral principle that singer use to justify his reasonning are

. Utilatarian: Peter singer think that right things to do whatever will and all things considered produced best consequences.

Effective altruism and global poverty .

Animal liberation ( reducing the suffering of farm animal)