alf UL Woulu Do you think they believe that what they are doing is morally perm
ID: 351150 • Letter: A
Question
alf UL Woulu Do you think they believe that what they are doing is morally perm How would you look at the situation i you wer manufacturers of Tris-impregnated pajamasf cre if you were o 4. If no law is broken, is there anything wron ing? If so, when is it wrong and why? Do any mo considerations support dumping products oversease this violates U.S. law? 5. What moral difference,if any, does it make who is dump- 6. Critically assess the present notification system. I it the 7. Putting aside the question of legality, what moral aru- ing, why they are doing it, where they are doing it, or what the product is? right approach, or is it fundamentally flawed? ments can be given for and against dumping? What your position on dumping, and what principles and w do you base it on? Should we have laws prohibiting m types of dumping? aluesExplanation / Answer
3. Speculate on why dumpers dump. Do they think they believe that what they are doing is morally permissible? How would you look at the situation if you were one of the manufacturers of Tris-impregnated pajamas?
Dumpers dump because they don’t want to have profit loss. I think that what they did is not morally permissible. If I were the manufacturer of Tris-impregnated pajamas, I would notice to public that those products may have potential dangerous.
4. If no law is broken, is there anything wrong with dumping? If so, when is it wrong and why? Do any moral considerations support dumping products overseas when this violates U.S. law?
Based on the last portion of this question, if “Dumping” overseas violates U.S. Law, then this question has already answered itself, because it is illegal and therefore wrong. It is wrong when the product that they are dumping may cause harm to the environment, animal, humans, etc. or the product is used on crops that eventually end up back in the US. If the product is safe and the producer manufactured an overabundance amount of the product, then I think that it is morally right to dump products into other countries if these countries lack or need these products to survive.
5. What moral difference, if any, does it make who is dumping, why are they doing it, where are they doing it, or what the product is?
It makes a great difference. If it is a company who is dumping chemicals because they are illegal in the US because it causes cancer, then it is morally wrong. It if is a company who has over produced winter coats and need to clear out there warehouse and they are dumping them to countries that needs them, then it is morally right. If a company is dumping because they don’t want to dispose of the product the proper way or wants to make a profit off it, then it is morally wrong. But if a company is dumping because they have overproduced a safe product and are not looking for a profit, then it is morally right. If a company is dumping products to any country just to get rid of it, then it is morally wrong. If a company is dumping the safe products to third world countries that are in need of the product, then it is morally right. If the product can cause harm to the environment, animals, human, etc., then it is morally wrong. But if the product doesn’t cause harm to anyone or anything, then it is morally right.
6. Critically assess the present notification system. Is it the right approach, or is it fundamentally flawed?
It is the right approach but it is fundamentally flawed if the other countries do not utilize the information. In theory, the present notification system has the great intention of doing the right thing. It is morally right to notify countries of the products that the US has banned use of. But it is fundamentally flawed if the other countries do not utilize the information that is given to them to notify their people of the dangers of using the product. Some of these countries don’t have regulatory agencies to ensure that the products being brought into their country are safe. They don’t have adequate testing facilities to test the products that companies want to bring into their country and they don’t have well-staffed customs departments to ensure that the unsafe products are not brought into their country.
7. Putting aside the question legality, what moral arguments can be given for and against dumping? What is your position on dumping, and what principles and values do you base it on? Should we have laws prohibiting more types of dumping?
A proto dumping products into third-world countries can help these countries by bringing products that they may otherwise never get. But the con to dumping unsafe products into these counties can actually kill people and in some cases, the product that is dumped can actually end up back into the US. I don’t agree with dumping illegal products into other countries. Not only is it morally wrong, but some of these counties government don’t care or understand the consequences of the potential harm that these products may cause. Killing is against the law and companies are killing people in other countries when they are dumping illegal unsafe products into their countries. It says in the bible and it is one of the Ten Commandments “Thou shall not kill” and that is what these companies are doing when they are dumping these unsafe products. We should have laws against dumping illegal products into other countries and these companies should be heavily fined and/or shut down.
I REQUEST YOU TO KINDLY RATE THE ANSWER AS THUMBS UP. THANKS, A LOT.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.