-Is forgiveness beneficial? Harmful? Is forgiveness compatible with justice? Is
ID: 3500962 • Letter: #
Question
-Is forgiveness beneficial? Harmful? Is forgiveness compatible with justice? Is forgiveness a necessary component of a moral or faithful life?
-define forgiveness
-Explain the pro-forgiveness position and John Kekes’ position. Which position do you find to be more persuasive? Why?
-Is forgiveness compatible with justice? Why or why not?
-identify as a person of faith, is forgiveness a necessary component of a faithful life? Why or why not?
If you use a quotation from a text, please cite the source
Explanation / Answer
Answer:
• Forgiveness is defined as the process in which there is a change in attitude and behaviour to the offender by the victim voluntarily and leaves the emotion(negative) and feeling of revenge.
• It is legally and morally justified because it is the innate virtue of human being and most of the religions are based on the concept of forgiveness. It is a blessing for both the people, offender and victim. It is also the very important component for better relation and faithful life. It is very beneficial for both people in three ways psychologically, socially and medically.
• Many studies show that people who practice the forgiveness are much happier and healthier in comparison to the angry and less forgiving people. According to the study of Wisconsin, forgiving people are less susceptible to cardiovascular and mental illnesses. On the other hand, less forgiving people founded attached to the various type of diseases.
• pro-forgiveness supported and encouraged the forgiveness because they believed that it is one of the most important virtues of the human being and necessary for the Harmony in our society.on the other hand, John kekes was against the pro forgiveness supporters because he believed that it is irrational and against the Justice.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.