How Grounded Is Your Love Life? In a recent experiment, psychologists at Univers

Question

How Grounded Is Your Love Life?

In a recent experiment, psychologists at University of Pittsburgh and the University of Waterloo in Canada decided to examine stability, turbulence and love. The researchers focused on stability because it is a term that has both literal and abstract meanings. Our bodies can be physically stable or they can be wobbly, and so can our intimate relationships. The study participants were 40 college students who reported being involved in a committed relationship that had lasted for at least a year. The researchers randomly assigned half of their volunteers to sit at a normal desk and the other half to sit at a workstation that had been subtly altered so that both the chair and the desk wiggled slightly. The volunteers individually completed questionnaires about their lives and romantic relationships, including whether they felt the relationship would last. The volunteers were alone in the room when they completed the questionnaire and were instructed to not put their name on the questionnaire. The ratings of perceived stability ranged from 1- 7 (1 = not at all likely to last to 7 = certain this relationship will last). A participant could report any number between 1 and 7 on that scale. The students who had been seated at the unstable workstations were much more likely to perceive instability in their love lives (mean = 4.17) than were the students whose chairs and work spaces didn’t waver (mean = 4.93). There is a statistically significant difference between these means (t(38) = 3.64; p<0.05).

A:
1. State the research question in plain language (I wonder if ___ is related to ___)
2. State the null hypothesis
3. State a research hypothesis
4. Is the research hypothesis directional or non-directional?
B: Name the Predictor / Independent Variable
Give the operational definition of the Predictor / Independent Variable.
Evaluate the construct validity of the Predictor / Independent Variable (Be sure to consider face, method, and procedural aspects though not all aspects will necessarily need to be discussed; point out strengths and weaknesses of this measure.)
C: Considering the previous scenario:
Name the Outcome / Dependent Variable
Give the operational definition of the Outcome / Dependent Variable.
Evaluate the construct validity of the operational definition for the Outcome / Dependent Variable. (Be sure to consider face, method, and procedural aspects though not all aspects will necessarily need to be discussed; point out strengths and weaknesses of this measure.)

Explanation / Answer

1.The research question in plain language is: I wonder if unstable workstations are likely to lead to a perception of instability in love lives.

2.The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in perception of instability in love lives of people having unstable and stable workstations. The observed difference is due to sampling error.

3.The research hypothesis is that the stability of workstation influences the perception of instability in love lives of the sampling population.

The research hypothesis is directional as the experimenter is not only predicting a relationship but providing the direction as well

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse H
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.