A proponent and an opponent of constitutional change are debating the merits of

Question

A proponent and an opponent of constitutional change are debating the merits of their political positions. Use the dropdown menus to complete their conversation.

1. PROPONENT: Let's face it: The Texas Constitution needs to be completely revised. It's horribly written, with all of that inoperable text and those amendments. At times, it is downright _______ .

A. enviable

B. Well organized

C. confusing

d. broad

2. OPPONENT: The constitution of the great state of Texas has served its purpose for more than 130 years. It is simply not necessary to replace the entire document—especially given that the state has a sufficient __________ process that allows for change over time.

A. amendment

B. recall

C.referendum

D. initiative

3. PROPONENT: But we've had so many amendments—more than 480 at last count. Compare that with only 27 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which has existed for almost 100 more years. I think it would be better to reorganize the document and eliminate any duplication, deadwood, and the need for all these statute-like details that would be better handled through regular ________ anyway.

a. arbitration

b. adjudication

c. execution

d. legislation

4.OPPONENT: But, in the process of reorganization, the government of Texas will only grow more powerful and cost more as a result. I don't want that money coming out of my pocket, especially through new ________ .

A. grants

B. bonds

C. taxes

D. loans

Explanation / Answer

A proponent and an opponent of constitutional change are debating the merits of their political positions. Use the dropdown menus to complete their conversation.

1. PROPONENT: Let's face it: The Texas Constitution needs to be completely revised. It's horribly written, with all of that inoperable text and those amendments. At times, it is downright confusing.

A. enviable

B. Well organized

C. confusing

d. broad

Explanation – The proponent is advocating a constitutional change therefore would highlight the negative feature in the existing constitution so confusing

2. OPPONENT: The constitution of the great state of Texas has served its purpose for more than 130 years. It is simply not necessary to replace the entire document—especially given that the state has a sufficient _ amendment process that allows for change over time.

A. amendment

B. recall

C.referendum

D. initiative

Explanation – Since the opponent is opposing the downright constitutional change the term amendment fits in the conversation

3. PROPONENT: But we've had so many amendments—more than 480 at last count. Compare that with only 27 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which has existed for almost 100 more years. I think it would be better to reorganize the document and eliminate any duplication, deadwood, and the need for all these statute-like details that would be better handled through regular legislation anyway.

a. arbitration

b. adjudication

c. execution

d. legislation

Explanation – constitutional changes happens through legislation

4.OPPONENT: But, in the process of reorganization, the government of Texas will only grow more powerful and cost more as a result. I don't want that money coming out of my pocket, especially through new taxes .

A. grants

B. bonds

C. taxes

D. loans

Explanation – as an individual we pay for higher government expenses through taxes

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse A
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.