Mortgage Fraud (Fraud Triangle and Detection) Hotel worker Danny Ruiz was living

Question

Mortgage Fraud (Fraud Triangle and Detection)

            Hotel worker Danny Ruiz was living with his wife and four children in a cramped New York apartment when he saw a television ad promising the family a way out. “Why rent when you can own your own home?” Pennsylvania builder Gene Percudani asked. The company even offered to pay his rent for a year, while he saved for a down payment. So the Ruizes fled the city for the Pocono Mountains, where they bought a three-bedroom Cape Cod in 1999 for $171,000. But when they tried to refinance less than two years later, the home was valued at just $125,000. “I flipped,” says Mr. Ruiz. His wife he says “went nuts.”

            Gene Percudani, a 51-year-old native of Queens, New York, built a thriving home-building business in this market, running folksy television ads offering New Yorkers new homes in Pennsylvania. If they joined Mr. Percudani’s program, called Why Rent, homeowners would find financing through another of his companies, Chapel Creek Mortgage, which brokered loans from J.P. Morgan Chase and the companies Chase Manhattan Mortgage unit.

            For years, the “Why Rent” program appealed to workers with modest salaries such as Eberht Rios, a truck driver for UPS. The Rios bought a home in the Poconos for $140,000. This year, when he tied to refinance, he was told the home was only valued at $100,000. One local appraiser, Dominick Stranieri, signed off on most of the Why Rent deals that state officials now say were overpriced, including the Rioses’ and the Ruizes’. Mr. Percudani’s firm picked Stranieri, his appraiser, because of his quick work and low fee of $250, instead of the typical $300 to $400. In exchange for a steady stream of work, Mr. Stranieri accepted without question valuations from Mr. Percudani’s company.

            Other common methods of creating revenues include investors and others buying distressed properties and then, using inflated appraisals, selling them for a big profit. In order to secure the efforts of a “dirty appraiser” those involved with the fraud would pay up to $1,500 under the table on top of the appraiser’s standard fee of $400.

            Another unique twist to the plot is that few of the people involved in making mortgage loans these days have a long-term interest in them. Traditionally, bankers had made loans directly and held them, giving the lenders a strong incentive to find fair appraisals to protect their interests. Today, many appraisers are picked by independent mortgage brokers, who are paid per transaction and have little stake in the long-term health of the loans. Many lenders also have lost a long-term interest in their loans, because they sell them off to investors. Appraisers increasingly fear that if they don’t go along with higher valuations sought by brokers, their business will dry up.

            Think a county appraiser would do a lot better than a private practitioner? Joel Marcus, a New York-based attorney recently had his property valued at $2.2 million by a county appraiser, up from $2 million the previous year, which means about a $7,200 jump in his property-tax bill. Based on recent home sales in his neighborhood, Mr. Marcus believes his property is valued at between $1.7 million and $1.8 million, and he has appealed his appraisal.

Although, a good appraisal requires hours of legwork, visiting a property to check its condition, and coming up with at least three comparable sales, Mr. Percudani says he isn’t surprised that later appraisals, or even different appraisals made at the same time, could result in different values. “Appraisals are opinions,” he says. “Value, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.” Stranieri and Percudani deny any wrongdoing and say they operated independently and that any home that declined in value did so because of a weaker economy. “It’s like buying a stock,” Mr. Percudani says in an interview “The value goes up. The value goes down.”

Requirements

How is an opportunity created to commit appraisal fraud? Does the appraiser act alone or is collusion routinely involved?

How is appraisal fraud detected? Is intent to deceive easily proven in appraisal fraud?

What pressures or perceived pressures can motivate appraisers to make faulty valuations?

How do appraisers rationalize their fraudulent behavior?

Why would a county perceive pressure to fraudulently inflate property values?

What controls would help to prevent appraisal fraud?

What natural controls exist to prevent homeowners from the desire to “massage the values” of their homes? Hint: think about a homeowner’s motivation

Explanation / Answer

Q) How is opportunity created to commit appraisal fraud? Does the appraiser act alone or is collusion routinely involved?

A) Mortgage fraud is not just predatory lending practices that target certain borrowers. Fraud for housing is committed by borrowers who often with the help of loan officers or other lender personnel, misrepresent or omit relevant details about employment &win one ,debt &creditor properly value & condition with the goal of obtaining or maintaining real estate ownership.

People I the mortgage industry acknowledge that appraisal fraud is common. The way appraisal fraud works is quite simple . One approaches a mortgage lender about refraining their home, they receive an estimate for the loan. It is important to note that fraud for housing can be committed by individuals who intend to rent the property as primary residence or by investors who intend to rent the property as a source of income or to resell for gain . The actions are motivated either you the desire to gain extra sales commission or simply increase an investment position.

No, the collusion does not routinely involve itself . They are charged during the wake of housing market collapse

Q) How is appraisal fraud detected

A) There is no foolproof method for preventing mortgage fund. A professional can detect &I address issue of mortgage by simply beginning with a thorough analysis of the loan file. No specific factor proves that fraud or misinterpretation is present. The items that might trigger a fraud are 1. Verifying identity 2. Mortgage application 3. Tax returns etc

Q)How do appraisers rationalise their fraudulent behaviour

A) Rationalization enables people to maintain their code of ethics and avoid guilt or self condemnation. It provides the justification for committing fraud and can take 3 forms. a) justification b)attitude c) lack of personnel integrity .there are 7 rationalisations for unethical actions

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse M
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.