QUESTION 1 According to Kant, an act has moral worth if it results from one\'s g
ID: 3490039 • Letter: Q
Question
QUESTION 1
According to Kant, an act has moral worth if
it results from one's good will to do one's duty to the moral law.
it leads to good consequences.
it is the result of a hypothetical imperative to help others.
it gives pleasure to the majority of those involved in the situation.
0.5 points
QUESTION 2
"Act only on that maxim that you can will as a universal law" is the
first form of the greatest happiness principle
second form of the hypothetical imperative
first form of the categorical imperative
second form of the categorical imperative
0.5 points
QUESTION 3
One problem with Kant's first categorical imperative is that
it is not rigid enough and doesn't offer law like prescriptions.
it cannot be applied using logic
it doesn't allow us any flexibility in our moral inquiry: if lying is wrong it will have to be wrong everywhere and at all times.
it is too egoistic.
0.5 points
QUESTION 4
Kant's second form of the categorical imperative tells us that we
should treat ourselves and others as people with inherent worth who cannot be used as a means to an end only.
can use other people, if they don't respect us, as a means to an end only.
can use others as a means to an end only but not use ourselves as a means to an end only.
should act on that maxim that you can will as a universal law.
0.5 points
QUESTION 5
The natural essence of a human according to Aristotle is
love
reason
desire
sensation
0.5 points
QUESTION 6
Natural rights are
based on civil rights.
granted by the state.
necessary for our proper functioning as humans.
always presented with strong backing arguments.
0.5 points
QUESTION 7
Kant's approach to ethics
always considers the consequences that flow from our actual actions when considering moral worth.
never determines moral worth by considering the consequences that comes from our actual actions.
only determines moral worth by seeing if an act causes pleasure.
sometimes evaluates the moral worth of an act by looking at the actual consequences of our actual acts.
0.5 points
QUESTION 8
According to natural law theory, we can come to know the natural law by examining
human nature.
civil rights
scientific laws.
only God's revelations.
0.5 points
QUESTION 9
According to natural law theorists, a natural moral law
is based on civil law.
is the same as a descriptive natural law of science.
is the basis for science.
is prescriptive and should be the basis for civil law.
0.5 points
QUESTION 10
A law that is written into nature that tells us how we should behave is
a descriptive law
a presciptive law
a scientific law
a civil law
a.it results from one's good will to do one's duty to the moral law.
b.it leads to good consequences.
c.it is the result of a hypothetical imperative to help others.
d.it gives pleasure to the majority of those involved in the situation.
Explanation / Answer
Ans 1 a) it results from one's good will to do one's duty to the moral law.
According to the Kant , the rightness of the act does not depend on the consequences of it , but it depends on whether they fulfill our duty. The act out of a good will was related to the act that was done out of the duty or moral obligation.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.