Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

1. Differentiate the ideas of Descartes and Locke to both the mind/body problem

ID: 3489721 • Letter: 1

Question

1. Differentiate the ideas of Descartes and Locke to both the mind/body problem and the nature/nurture 2. Why might the the efforts of Babbage and Ada be of interest and significance to the development of 3. The British ideas of association and empiricism developed through the 1700s and 1800s, bringing the Empiricists and Associationists as seen in Berkeley and James and John Mills? Did Berkeley's ideas of problem. How do they differ and how are they the same? What ideas ae nativistic? psychology? Draw upon the book and your own ideas for this answer discipline of psychology closer to becoming a real science. What are the main principles of the British primary and secondary qualities agree/disagree with Locke and why?

Explanation / Answer

The main difference between Descartes and Locke is that Descartes is more of a rationalist, one who holds that knowledge of the world which can be gained by pure reason, while Locke was an empiricist, one who believed that knowledge of the world comes only through the senses. Accordingly, Descartes ins his many meditation attempts to deduce from our intuitions, principles of self, God, of the mind as a thinking substance, and of extended bodies as material substances. Locke on the other hand, asserts that we acquire knowledge by sensation, direct sensory impressions of the external world and reflection, the mental process of breaking down comples impressions into simpler ones and compare them, abstract them and recombine them to form new ideas.

Locke says an idea is that which the mind percieves in itself, or is the immediate object of perception, though or understanding and Descartes says idea is whatever is immediately percieved by the mind. For both of them there is something about man that sets him apart from machines and animals, they both talk about free will in particular; they consider how it is that our will may be both directed and remain free, and how it is consistent with the existense of a God that we can err in our ways.