Original Source Material Student Version You could even skip the debate and simp

Question

Original Source Material Student Version You could even skip the debate and simply concentrate on getting letters to candidates. The key is to act. Concentrate on two or three issues at the most. If you write on twelve topics, you dissipate the effect. Keep the letter short, one page if possible, two at the most. Your lawmakers and their staffs are busy and are not likely to do more than glance at a long letter. References: Simon, P. (2003). Our culture of pandering. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. There are many ways to participate in the electoral process. Town hall debates are often open to the public in smaller elections. These debates may provide opportunities for the public to ask questions directly. However, “you could even skip the debate and simply concentrate on getting letters to candidates” since the letter writing approach is not dependent on being able to get access to limited microphone time (Simon, 2003). Which of the following is true for the Student Version above? Word-for-Word plagiarism Paraphrasing plagiarism This is not plagiarism

Explanation / Answer

This does not look like plagiarism to me. Although one part of the sentence is the same ( you could even skip the..."), the source is mentioned as Simon 2003. So it's not word for word plagiarism. There is no praphrasing plagiarism either because the content in the original material is not literally summarized in the student version.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse O
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.