In a fallacy of weak induction: The premises are logically relevant, but psychol

Question

In a fallacy of weak induction:

The premises are logically relevant, but psychologically irrelevant, to the conclusion.

The premises are psychologically relevant, but logically irrelevant, to the conclusion.

Terms are not clearly defined.

The premises are logically relevant, but do not provide adequate support for the conclusion.

There is a problem with the logical form of the argument.

The premises are logically relevant, but psychologically irrelevant, to the conclusion.

The premises are psychologically relevant, but logically irrelevant, to the conclusion.

Terms are not clearly defined.

The premises are logically relevant, but do not provide adequate support for the conclusion.

There is a problem with the logical form of the argument.

Explanation / Answer

Answer: The premises are logically relevant, but do not provide adequate support for the conclusion.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.