Read Vrabel v Acri When is an individual liable for the actions of an agent? If
ID: 346373 • Letter: R
Question
Read Vrabel v Acri
When is an individual liable for the actions of an agent? If partners are considered each other's agents, why wasn't Mrs. Acri held personally liable for the vicious attack her partner had committed against a patron of their establishment? Although she eventually won the case, her personal assets were at risk and she had to defend them in court. What could she have done once she realized that she would have no say in how the establishment was run, to protect her personal assets?
Explanation / Answer
In this specific case, the couple owned the specific Cafe before they separated.Mrs. Acri it was only responsible for looking after the cafe and managing the cafe when Mr. Acri was ill. After the couple was separated Mr. Acri took the charge of the cafe for the control as well as the management.
This information is very important for the liability purposes as it provides specific information about the case and clear sound the confusion of liability as well as setting up the defendants.
Mr. Acri was not a defendant because he already stayed in jail for the crime he committed. He was found guilty for murder and Already tried as well as he was already in the state present hence Mr. Acri was not a defendant.
In this specific case Mr. Acri is liable for the injuries as there was a partnership between him and his wife. According to the uniform Partnership Act, both the partners are liable if any one of them does anything wrong hence we can confirm that Mr. Acri was liable for the specific act.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.