1. Suppose someone gives the following argument: Car seat belts offer protection
ID: 3461851 • Letter: 1
Question
1. Suppose someone gives the following argument:
Car seat belts offer protection from serious injury to the driver and passengers. Although requiring people to wear them is a constraint on our freedom to choose, it seems like an acceptable restraint to most people. Wearing a helmet while driving a motorcycle offers protection from serious injury to the motorcycle driver and passengers. Requiring people to wear them is a constraint on our freedom to choose, but it seems like an acceptable restraint to most people. However, car manufacturers are required to provide seat belts already installed in the car at time of purchase. So, it is not unreasonable for motorcycle buyers to expect that the motorcycle manufacturer provide helmets at the time of purchase.
You respond to this argument by saying, "A seatbelt does not restrict your vision while driving but a helmet reduces the ability to see what is going on around you." What strategy of evaluation is reflected in your response?
2. Is a fallacy present? If so, which one?
We should not allow professional athletes to take Viagra. Viagra is a performance enhancing drug, and such performance enhancing drugs should be banned for all professional athletes.
3.
Finish this sentence:
In general, the larger a sample is, ...
4.
Santiago is thinking about registering for Professor Langley's course in Italian Renaissance history. Lakeisha took the course a year earlier and got an A. Santiago figures that he will get an A, too. How does the following fact affect Santiago’s conclusion?
Santiago discovers four biology majors who took Professor Langley's course in Italian Renaissance history, and all four got As.
number of primary analogs relevance of similarities specificity of the conclusion nature and degree of disanalogy number of similaritiesExplanation / Answer
Ans. 1 option C
The statement is reserving specificity of conclusion because we can analyse many factors and logics to prove and disprove the statement. We can also think about that, wearing helmet is not more comfortable than using seat belt or carrying helmet is a problem, we have so many reason to qualify or disqualify the statement.
Ans. 2 option B
The sentence is describing about composition fallacy because we are using a small criteria for whole population or group. The fallacy of composition arises which one infers that something is true of the whole form the fact that is true of some part of the whole population.
Ans.3 Option C
The size of N is any research affects the result, the larger sample is more is the more closely it resembles the population and more accurately describe the result and conclusion.
Ans. 4 option C
The Santiago’s thinking will be affected by the previous result as well as number of students enrolled in the course. This approach and thinking by analogy, strength the conclusion of Santiago. According to Santiago the probability to get A is greater than other rank because he used the previous experiences and results.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.