Richard Nixon once called Iran and Saudi Arabia the “twin pillars” of United Sta

Question

Richard Nixon once called Iran and Saudi Arabia the “twin pillars” of United States security policy in the Middle East. Among other things, Nixon was referring to the hope that these countries would be tremendous aids to the United States in fighting the Cold War against the Soviet Union. Besides their usefulness for the Cold War, identify three aspects that Iran and Saudi Arabia share that provide the basis for characterizing them as “twin pillars.” For each aspect that you mention, provide full and clear explanation of how that aspect applies to both nations and how that aspect relates to the idea that the two nations are “twin pillars.”

Explanation / Answer

The choice by Great Britain in the late 1960s to pull back its military powers from the Persian Gulf and to allow freedom to its ten protectorates along the east bank of the Arabian Peninsula went up against the United States with a vital situation. It was the tallness of Cold War contention with the Soviet Union, and the United States was profoundly associated with Vietnam. Therefore, the United States chose rather than guide intercession to develop its two territorial partners, Iran and Saudi Arabia, as nearby powers that could shield the locale from the spread of Soviet impact. As the "twin pillars" of U.S. policy, the two nations were urged to gain billions of dollars of the most exceptional arms amid the 1970s. Iran grasped the twin pillars policy more eagerly than Saudi Arabia and interceded militarily, with U.S. endorsement, in Iraq and Oman. The policy crumbled all of a sudden in 1979, when the shah (ruler) of Iran was ousted in a transformation that conveyed to control a republican administration contradicted to U.S. impact in the area.

Investigation

Iran and Saudi Arabia: From Twin Pillars to Cold Peace?

By Paul Iddon 13/3/2016

Picture credit: shutterstock.com

Picture credit: shutterstock.com

In his far reaching meeting with the Atlantic magazine a week ago US President Barack Obama contended that a "frosty peace" should be set up amongst Iran and Saudi Arabia who both need to make sense of some approach to "share the area."

Obama suggested the intermediary wars which the two nations are battling in Syria and Yemen which has additionally destabilized the locale and exacerbated and delayed those contentions. However his remarks clarify that Riyadh and Tehran stay significant powers in the locale. Both have the ability to either dive it encourage into a slough of partisan brutality and turmoil or to manufacture assentions and bargains which could settle it and end a portion of the contentions which are by and by tearing it separated.

The president Nixon's affirmation that these two nations constitute huge powers in the district helps one to remember the late 1960s and mid 1970s when the United States, knee-profound as it was in the wildernesses of Vietnam, designated more prominent obligations to its provincial powers as a component of the Nixon Doctrine when it went to the security and barrier of their particular areas. This prompted the introduction of the Twin Pillars Policy, which basically observed the US distribute more prominent duty to Saudi Arabia and Iran as the two powers whose activity it was to secure the deliberately essential Persian Gulf district. While this soon observed the US center principally around working up the Shah's Iran into the prevailing military power in the Gulf locale (a power which mediated plainly and clandestinely in inside clashes in Oman and Iraqi Kurdistan) the policy by the by underscored the significance of these two nations.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse R
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.