2 of 2 orth 3 Points What did the Supreme Court rule in NF1B v Sebelius about th

Question

2 of 2 orth 3 Points What did the Supreme Court rule in NF1B v Sebelius about the Medicaid expansion in the Affordable Care Act? O That the expansion was nal because Article ll f the Constitution specificly ftobids the expansion of programs that are partally unded by state governments without the consent of two-thirds of state legislatures. That only states with historically low health insurance enrollment rates were required to comply with the Affordable Care Act use of Congress' spending power that put states in the unfair of position of That the e implementing the Medicaid expansion or losing all their federal Medicaid funding. O That the expansion of Medicaid was constitutional because it falls well within the scope of the "Necessary and Proper Clause 3 attempts remaining Submit

Explanation / Answer

Answer: C) the expansion was unconstitutional because it was a coercive use of Congress’ spending power that put states in the unfair position of implementing the Medicaid expansion or losing all their federal Medicaid funding

Though, the expansion had been ruled unconstitutional, most of the provisions of the ACA were kept intact. This was name unconstitutional because the mandate was not in accordance with the necessary and proper clause or the commerce clause of the congress.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse 2
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.