(Note: You can skip the Statistical Analyses (on p.286) and Table 1 (on p,287) I
ID: 3451251 • Letter: #
Question
(Note: You can skip the Statistical Analyses (on p.286) and Table 1 (on p,287) Inpact of cannabidiol on the acute memory and psychotomimetic effects of smoked cannabis: naturalistic study. Morgan et al. 2010 1) What features characterize this as a Naturalistic study? 2) What are the advantages of a Naturalistic study versusa laboratory study? 3) Briefly, identify the somatic and behavioral variables. 4) What are the operational definitions of "memory," i.e. how was memory measured? 5) What were other psychological measures used in the study? 6) What are the main findings of the study? 7) What is the hypothesized neural mechanism underlying the relationship between THC and Cannabidiol? 8) According to the study (and outside references) what are the benefits and risk of THC? Benefits and risks of cannabidiol? 9) What are the study's recommendations for minimizing risk? 10) What might be some limitations in generalizing the results of this sExplanation / Answer
1. This was a naturalistic study because the participants were tested on memory and psychotomimetic symptoms when they were intoxicated by their own chosen marijuana, rather than having it administered by the experimenter.
2. The main challenge associated with a naturalistic study is that the independent variable cannot be manipulated by the experiments and can only be controlled through the process of selecting existing variables.
3. The somatic and behavioural variables in the study were memory and psychotemimetic symptoms.
4. Verbal memory was measured using the prose recall test and episodic memory was assessed using the source recall test.
Please post the other questions separately as we are supposed to answer just one question or four sub parts of a question.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.