Some people argue that homosexuality is viewed no differently than skin color in

Question

Some people argue that homosexuality is viewed no differently than skin color in our society. Laws have been made in some states to protect against discrimination based on race. Why are some states reluctant to extend discrimination laws? Is this based upon the society of that state? In your first post: Define race and contrast that with the concept of ethnicity. How do race and ethnicity result in social stratification? Does this stratification exist in the workplace? Review the employment laws https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/index.cfm Explain whether you believe discrimination laws should be specific to various groups—race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. Should states be able to create their own anti-discrimination laws, or should these be federally mandated?

Explanation / Answer

The given question pertains to the conundrum of human life in the present time where politics is deeply subterfuged with the norms and values prevalent in a given society. One only needs to reflect a n the political scientist Lasswell’s d3finition of politics in which he described politics as the use of who gets what, when an how. This definition makes it evident that the State and institutions of the State such as law represent and mirror the social difference between the dominant or the ruling group and the ruled or the subordinate groups. The stratification of society prevails along lines of class, race, gender and today, sexual orientation is another Thriving criterion which is found to operate in the distribution of social, economic and political power and opportunities in society. A primary factor which is found to determine the ethical and moral reasoning behind state laws is the extent to which the religious and societal norms influence the federal politics in states. Thus, states which are supported by more conservative groups will ultimately try to frame laws which correspond to the religious and social sentiments of the majority residents of the state. Thus, even while, states may extend anti discrimination laws to granting protection of racial minorities against prejudiced maltreatment in the workplace, the state laws would be unlikely to extend the same protection to sexual minorities in the state if the ruling conservative class devalues sexual orientations that challenge its own heteronormative beliefs.

However this existing duality in the state laws does not in any make it justifiable. Rather, it presents a case of the political influence of groups with greater stakes in society as the legitimate authority which in hindsight can be argued to nullify the anti discrimination law in its entirety.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.