Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

The following table is a summary of randomly chosen student evaluations of facul

ID: 3434203 • Letter: T

Question

The following table is a summary of randomly chosen student evaluations of faculty at a university over a three-year period.  The researcher is interested in whether the distribution of evaluations differs by faculty rank.

Rank

Evaluation

Assistant Professor

Associate Professor

Professor

Total

Above Average

44

36

34

114

Below Average

31

29

51

111

Total

75

65

85

225

Which of the following correctly characterizes the p-value?

a.

p-value < .01

b.

.01 < p-value < .025

c.

.025 < p-value < .05

d.

.05 < p-value < .10

e.

p-value > .10

Do the above data provide evidence at the .025 level that evaluation and faculty rank are dependent?

a.

yes

b.

no

c.

cannot be determined

d.

maybe?

e.

Pie

Rank

Evaluation

Assistant Professor

Associate Professor

Professor

Total

Above Average

44

36

34

114

Below Average

31

29

51

111

Total

75

65

85

225

Explanation / Answer

The following table is a summary of randomly chosen student evaluations of faculty at a university over a three-year period.  The researcher is interested in whether the distribution of evaluations differs by faculty rank.

Rank

Evaluation

Assistant Professor

Associate Professor

Professor

Total

Above Average

44

36

34

114

Below Average

31

29

51

111

Total

75

65

85

225

Chi-Square Test

Observed Frequencies

Column variable

Calculations

Row variable

Assistant Professor

Associate Professor

Professor

Total

fo-fe

Above Average

44

36

34

114

6

3.0667

-9.0667

Below Average

31

29

51

111

-6

-3.0667

9.0667

Total

75

65

85

225

Expected Frequencies

Column variable

Row variable

Assistant Professor

Associate Professor

Professor

Total

(fo-fe)^2/fe

Above Average

38

32.9333

43.0667

114

0.9474

0.2856

1.9088

Below Average

37

32.0667

41.9333

111

0.9730

0.2933

1.9604

Total

75

65

85

225

Data

Level of Significance

0.025

Number of Rows

2

Number of Columns

3

Degrees of Freedom

2

Results

Critical Value

7.3778

Chi-Square Test Statistic

6.3683

p-Value

0.0414

Do not Reject the null hypothesis

Which of the following correctly characterizes the p-value?

a.

p-value < .01

b.

.01 < p-value < .025

c.

.025 < p-value < .05

d.

.05 < p-value < .10

e.

p-value > .10

Do the above data provide evidence at the .025 level that evaluation and faculty rank are dependent?

a.

yes

b.

no

c.

cannot be determined

d.

maybe?

e.

Pie

Rank

Evaluation

Assistant Professor

Associate Professor

Professor

Total

Above Average

44

36

34

114

Below Average

31

29

51

111

Total

75

65

85

225

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote