Read the “Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software” article (Spinellis, et

Question

Read the “Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software” article (Spinellis, et al., 2009).

What are the strengths and weaknesses of this particular study, i.e. their research methods and not their actual reseach results? (For example, does the study do an adequate job of collecting and analyzing representative samples?)

What would you suggest that the authors do to remedy those weaknesses and why?

Use both your text and the article An Introduction to Research Design (Ganster, 2003). You may also draw on any book, article, website, or other reliable resource in answering this question.

Ganster, D. (2003). An introduction to research design. Data Analysis and Interpretation course notes.

Spinellis, D., Gousios, G., Karakoidas, V., Louridas, P., Adams, P. J., Samoladas, I., & Stamelos, I. (2009). Evaluating the quality of open source software. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 233, 5–2 8.

Explanation / Answer

Dear! If you want to ask something you can not understand then please either provide link for the question or post the image or just copy the data or question. We experts don't have the access to the books data mentioned by you people. If you seriously possess some doubts then please provide the data or question. Here you have not mentioned about the study you want to talk about so do mention it!

Thanks

Happy learning!

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse R
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.