Suppose the null hypothesis is NOT rejected 3 years ago the mean price of a sing
ID: 3356019 • Letter: S
Question
Suppose the null hypothesis is NOT rejected3 years ago the mean price of a single family home was 243,749. A real estate broker believed that the mean price has decreased since then. Which is correct? A. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude the mean price B. There is sufficient evidence to concluded the mean price Suppose the null hypothesis is NOT rejected
3 years ago the mean price of a single family home was 243,749. A real estate broker believed that the mean price has decreased since then. Which is correct? A. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude the mean price B. There is sufficient evidence to concluded the mean price Suppose the null hypothesis is NOT rejected
A. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude the mean price B. There is sufficient evidence to concluded the mean price
Explanation / Answer
the null hypothesis is NOT rejected
Answer :
A) There is not sufficient evidence to conclude the mean price.
Related Questions
Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.