Model1 :qualified=4.5 + 0.28571*weight:relate Call: lm(formula = qualified ~ wei
ID: 3355988 • Letter: M
Question
Model1 :qualified=4.5 + 0.28571*weight:relate
Call:
lm(formula = qualified ~ weight:relate, data = data)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-3.7857 -1.0714 -0.0714 0.9286 2.9286
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 5.50000 0.22591 24.346 <2e-16 ***
weight:relate 0.28571 0.08539 3.346 0.001 **
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 1.294 on 174 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.06046, Adjusted R-squared: 0.05506
F-statistic: 11.2 on 1 and 174 DF, p-value: 0.001004
Model2:qualified=4.51164 + 0.63836*weight + 0.59788*relate - 0.09788*weight: relate
Call:
lm(formula = qualified ~ weight + relate + weight:relate, data = data)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-3.65 -1.15 -0.15 0.85 2.85
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 4.51164 1.01676 4.437 1.62e-05 ***
weight 0.63836 0.63416 1.007 0.316
relate 0.59788 0.63888 0.936 0.351
weight:relate -0.09788 0.39435 -0.248 0.804
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 1.298 on 172 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.06599, Adjusted R-squared: 0.0497
F-statistic: 4.051 on 3 and 172 DF, p-value: 0.008192
in what way model 1 equivalent to model 2? in what way is it different? between these two models, which one is better and why?
Explanation / Answer
Both the models are linear multiple regression model. Both contains the interaction terms.
In the model 1 the interaction terms are significant while in the model 2 the interacton term is not significant.
Model 2 is better than tha model 1 since the Multiple R-squared: 0.06599 for Model 2 fits the model better than model 1. This indicates the improvement in the model 2 as compared to model 1 since the R-squared value is increased.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.