Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

O |ezto.mheducationcom/hm.tpx Wenton Powersports produces dune buggies They have

ID: 3314070 • Letter: O

Question

O |ezto.mheducationcom/hm.tpx Wenton Powersports produces dune buggies They have three assembly ines, Razor Bazer nd Tracer," named after the particular dune buggy models produped on those lines. Each assembly line was originaly designed using the same target production rate. However, over the years, various changes have been made to the Ines. Accordingly, management wishes to determine whether the assembly ines are st operting at the same average hourty prockuction rate. Production data (n dune buggles/hour) for the last eight hours are as folows 10 10 10 10 10 13 .97500 = 1.0714 T-a6250 =0.8303 n.10. 1250 2A107 1.0000 08303 a Construct an ANOVA table. Assume production rates are normally distributed (Round SS, MS, and F to 2 decimal places and p-value to 4 decimal places) MS of Between Groups Within Groups Total b. Specify the competing hypotheses to test whether there are some diflerences in the mean production rates across the three assembly lines O H : pamor = ettr . prwe Ha: Not all population means are equal. ON;: 9er Susaar H. Not all population means are equal Ms Not al pouasion means are equal 0-1. At the 5% significance level. what is the conclusion of the test? (Click to select) Hwe(Click to select condlude that the mean bugoies/hour difflers for c-2, what about the 10% signifcance lever? (Click to seeet- Hu we(Gick to seiect) endude hat the mean buggeshour differs for Type here to search

Explanation / Answer

a) from above:

b)

1st option is correct

c)fail to reject Ho we do not have evidence to conclude.......

d) rejeect Ho we have evidence to conclude.........

i ni Xi Si^2 ni*(Xi- grand mean)^2 (ni-1)*Si^2 8 10.125 2.4107 3.125 16.875 8 9.75 1.0714 0.500 7.500 8 8.625 0.8393 6.125 5.875 Weighted mean 9.500 9.750 30.250 SSG SSE Source of variation SS df MS F P value treatment 9.750 2 4.88 3.38 0.0532 error 30.250 21 1.44 total 40.000 23