Use yourself sentence. And follow that format. 5. Jen-Zam Enterprises Inc. v. Me

Question

Use yourself sentence. And follow that format. 5. Jen-Zam Enterprises Inc. v. Mehrabian, 2006 CanLII 17753 (ON SC.) Mehrabian traded in a Toyota 4Runner on a new Subaru Legacy, receiving a $14 000 credit It turned out later that the 4Runner was stolen. This action is brought by the automobile dealer (Jen-Zam) to recover the $14 000 from Mehrabian. Mehrabian takes the position that he is completely innocent, knowing nothing of the vehicle being stolen. Assuming that he is innocent and sold the vehicle not knowing it was stolen, explain the arguments available to the parties as to their respective legal positions and the likely outcome of the action.

Explanation / Answer

Caption:Zen-Jam v Mehrabin
Cause of action: on $14,000 Mehrabin was handed over toyota 4runner.

Legal issues and rules:
Plaintiff perspective: Plaintiff should receive $14,000 from Mehrabin toyota 4runner.Mehrabin had agreed to pay $14,000 only then toyota 4runner was handed over to him. Resulting in breach of contract.
Defendant perspective: Mehrabin claims to be innocent unaware of the contract and stolen car.

Ruling and reason:
Mehrabin is liable to pay $14,000 to Zen-Jam

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse U
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.