Sample N Mean StDev SEMean 1 60 51.6 23.7 3.1 2 59 51.4 23.2 3.0 Difference = mu
ID: 3257828 • Letter: S
Question
Sample N Mean StDev SEMean
1 60 51.6 23.7 3.1
2 59 51.4 23.2 3.0
Difference = mu(1) - mu(2)
Estimate for difference: 0.200000
95% CI for difference: (-8.316130,8.716130) T-Test of difference = 0(vs not = ):
T@Value = 0.05 P@Value = 0.963 DF = 117
Both use Pooled StDev = 23.4535
Surgery verses placebo for knee pain Refer to Example 10, “Arthroscopic Surgery.” Here we show MINITAB output comparing mean knee pain scores for the placebo (Group 1) to debridement arthroscopic surgery (Group 2).
State and interpret the result of the confidence interval.
State all steps and interpret the result of the significance test.
Based on the confidence interval and test, would you conclude that the arthroscopic surgery works better than placebo? Explain.
Explanation / Answer
state and interpret the result of the confidence interval
95% CI for difference: (-8.316130,8.716130)
- there is 95 % probability that difference between two populaiton mean will lie in this confidence interval
State all steps and interpret the result of the significance test.
Ts = (X1bar - X2bar)/(sp*sqrt(1/n1+1/n2)
=(51.6-51.4)/(23.4535*sqrt(1/60+1/59))
=0.0465
p-value = 0.963
since p-value is more than 0.05
we fail to reject then null hypothesis
Based on the confidence interval and test, would you conclude that the arthroscopic surgery works better than placebo?
similarly as 0 is in confidence interval ,we fail to reject the null hypothesis
and conclude that there is no significant evidence that
that the arthroscopic surgery works better than placebo
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.