Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

The SAS System The REG Procedure Model: MODEL1 Dependent Variable: totsat Number

ID: 3229706 • Letter: T

Question

The SAS System

The REG Procedure

Model: MODEL1

Dependent Variable: totsat

Number of Observations Read

51

Number of Observations Used

51

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF

Sum of
Squares

Mean
Square

F Value

Pr > F

Model

1

41712

41712

5.18

0.0272

Error

49

394455

8050.10685

Corrected Total

50

436167

Root MSE

89.72239

R-Square

0.0956

Dependent Mean

1070.05882

Adj R-Sq

0.0772

Coeff Var

8.38481

Parameter Estimates

Variable

Label

DF

Parameter
Estimate

Standard
Error

t Value

Pr > |t|

Intercept

Intercept

1

1175.62307

48.04726

24.47

<.0001

texppp

texppp

1

-0.00953

0.00419

-2.28

0.0272

Present results for model 1 in equation form, (should include standard error or (t stats), R^2 and adj R2 when you present your results for ALL models)

Using run MODE 1; a bivariate regression to measure the effect of total expenditure per pupil (TEXPPP) on SAT scores, explain if expenditure pays a roll for pupils

Provide informal evidence to support the statistical significance of the independent variable

If education spending per pupil where to increase by 1000 what is the predicted effect on TOTSAT?

Think of model 1 as being subject to an omitted variable bias.

What is the correlation between PERTAKE and EXPPP?

What is the likely sign of the bias to coefficient estimate on TEXPPP in model 1)

The SAS System

Explanation / Answer

Model is

SAT =                    1175.6231         -                 0.0095 texppp   , R2=9.56% , Adj. R2=7.72%

(SE)                        (48.0473)                            (0.0042)

(t)                           (24.47)                                 (-2.28)

(p-value)             (<0.0001)                             (0.0272)

At 5% level of significance, texppp is a significant predictor of SAT, t=-2.28, p=0.0272<0.05. Corresponding to unit increase in total expenditure per pupil there is on an average 0.0095 decrease in SAT score.

If expenditure increases by 1000, then on an average TOTSAT increase by 9.5

Let the correlation between PERTAKE and EXPPP is negative.

Thenn likely sign of bias will be upward as both predicotrs correlation and coefficient of totexpp are negative

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote