Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle desig

ID: 3228713 • Letter: A

Question

A consumer preference study compares the effects of three different bottle designs (A, B, and C) on sales of a popular fabric softener. A completely randomized design is employed. Specifically, 15 supermarkets of equal sales potential are selected, and 5 of these supermarkets are randomly assigned to each bottle design. The number of bottles sold in 24 hours at each supermarket is recorded. The data obtained are displayed in the following table. The Excel output of a one-way ANOVA of the Bottle Design Study Data is shown below. (a) Test the null hypothesis that mu A, mu B, and mu C are equal by setting a = .05. Based on this test, can we conclude that bottle designs A, B, and C have different effects on mean daily sales? (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) (b) Consider the pairwise differences mu B - mu A, mu C - mu A, and mu C - mu B. Find a point estimate of and a Tukey simultaneous 95 percent confidence interval for each pairwise difference. Interpret the results in practical terms. Which bottle design maximizes mean daily sales? (Round your answers to 2 decimal places. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.) The q-0.05 value to use for part b is 3.77 (c) Find a 95 percent confidence interval for each of the treatment means mu A, mu B, mu C. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.)

Explanation / Answer

Answer:

MINITAB output:

One-way ANOVA: A, B, C

Method

Null hypothesis         All means are equal

Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different

Significance level      = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values

Factor       3 A, B, C

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS   Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Factor   2 656.13 328.067    43.36    0.000

Error   12   90.80    7.567

Total   14 746.93

Model Summary

      S    R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

2.75076 87.84%     85.82%      81.01%

C).

Means

Factor N   Mean StDev      95% CI

A       5 16.60   2.30 (13.92, 19.28)

B      5 32.80   3.03 (30.12, 35.48)

C       5 24.80   2.86 (22.12, 27.48)

Pooled StDev = 2.75076

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Factor N   Mean Grouping

B       5 32.80 A

C       5 24.80    B

A       5 16.60      C

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous Tests for Differences of Means

b).

Difference Difference       SE of                            Adjusted

of Levels     of Means Difference       95% CI         T-Value   P-Value

B - A            16.20        1.74 ( 11.56, 20.84)     9.31     0.000

C - A             8.20        1.74 ( 3.56, 12.84)       4.71     0.001

C - B            -8.00        1.74    (-12.64, -3.36)    -4.60     0.002

Individual confidence level = 97.94%

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote