Waist-to-hip ratio. Dr. Aaron R. Folsom, from the University of Minnesota School
ID: 3199418 • Letter: W
Question
Waist-to-hip ratio. Dr. Aaron R. Folsom, from the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, has concluded that for a man aged 50 to 69 to be in good health, his waist size w should be less than or equal to 95% of his hip size h as shown in the figure.
a)
Write an inequality that describes the region shown in the figure.
b)
Is a man in this group with a 36-inch waist and 37-inch hips in good health?
c)
If a man in this group has a waist of 38 inches, then what is his minimum hip size for good health?
a)
Write an inequality that describes the region shown in the figure.
b)
Is a man in this group with a 36-inch waist and 37-inch hips in good health?
c)
If a man in this group has a waist of 38 inches, then what is his minimum hip size for good health?
Explanation / Answer
Answer is below, I've explaned the reason behind the solutions. Please don't hesitate to give a "thumbs up" in case you're satisfied with the answers, it encourages us to solve problems.
We have been given the fact that waist size w should be less than or equal to 95% of his hip size h
a. So,In equality that describes the region is :
y<=0.95(x)+30/.95
y<= .95x + 31.6
b. With a 36inch waist and 37inch hip will have a hip size ratio of 36/37 = .973 which is more than the permitted
value for good health of .95. Hence, a man with 36inch waist and 37 inch hips is not in good health.
c. If a man has waist of 38-inch then .95 <= w/h
or
38/h >= .95
h >= 38/.95 = 40
So, minimum hips should be 40 inches
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.