Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

A researcher used a one-factor ANOVA for between-groups to test the effectivenes

ID: 3182881 • Letter: A

Question

A researcher used a one-factor ANOVA for between-groups to test the effectiveness of three teaching methods for autistic children. The experiment was conducted with three samples of n = 10 autistic children in each group. The results of the analysis are shown in the following summary table.

                            

                                           Source              SS         df        MS             

                           Between Treatments       50         ____     ____    F = 5.00  

                           Within Treatments                     ____     ____    

                           Total                             ___        ____

          A. Fill in all missing values in the table. Show your work (i.e., all computational steps for finding the missing values). Hint: start with the df values.

         

          B. Do these data indicate any significant differences among the three teaching methods (assume p < .05)?

              Your answer should include:

the null hypothesis H0 & the alternative hypothesis H1

the critical F value used for the decision about H0

if the difference is statistically significant, compute the effect size, 2

the conclusion in APA style format.

Explanation / Answer

Part A)

Source

SS

df

MS

F

Between Treatments

50

3 - 1 = 2

25

5

Within Treatments

27 * 5 = 135

(3*10) -3 = 27

25 / 5 = 5

Total

135 + 50 = 185

(3*10) - 1 = 29

Source

SS

df

MS

F

Between Treatments

50

2

25

5

Within Treatments

135

27

5

Total

185

29

Part B)

Null and Alternative Hypothesis:

Null Hypothesis (H0): µ1 = µ2 = µ3; i.e, all the three population means are equal.

Alternative Hypothesis (H): At least one of the population mean differs.

For 2,27derees of freedom we get the critical F at 5% level of significance as 3.354

The null hypothesis can be rejected if calculated test statistics is greater or equal to the critical value of 3.354. Here the test statistics value is greater than the critical value (5 > 3.354); we reject the null hypothesis at 5% level of significance. The difference is statistically significant.

Eta^2 = 50 / 135 = 0.2703

Conclusion:

There was a significant effect of teaching method on autistic children at the p<.05 level for the three conditions [F(2, 27) = 5, p = 0.014]

P-value calculation in excel: =FDIST(5,2,27)

Source

SS

df

MS

F

Between Treatments

50

3 - 1 = 2

25

5

Within Treatments

27 * 5 = 135

(3*10) -3 = 27

25 / 5 = 5

Total

135 + 50 = 185

(3*10) - 1 = 29

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote