Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

As part of the study on ongoing fright symptoms due to exposure to horror movies

ID: 3181642 • Letter: A

Question

As part of the study on ongoing fright symptoms due to exposure to horror movies at a young age, the following table was presented to describe the lasting impact these movies have had during bedtime and waking life:

(a) What percent of the students have lasting waking-life symptoms? (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
%

(b) What percent of the students have both waking-life and bedtime symptoms? (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
%

(c) Test whether there is an association between waking-life and bedtime symptoms. State the null and alternative hypotheses. (Use = 0.01.)

Null Hypothesis:

H0: Bedtime symptoms cause waking symptoms.

H0: Waking symptoms cause bedtime symptoms.     

H0: There is no relationship between waking and bedtime symptoms.

H0: There is a relationship between waking and bedtime symptoms.

Alternative Hypothesis:

Ha: Waking symptoms cause bedtime symptoms.

Ha: Bedtime symptoms cause waking symptoms.     

Ha: There is a relationship between waking and bedtime symptoms.

Ha: There is no relationship between waking and bedtime symptoms.

State the 2 statistic and the P-value. (Round your answers for 2 and the P-value to three decimal places.)

Conclusion:

We have enough evidence to conclude that there is a relationship.

We do not have enough evidence to conclude that there is a relationship.

     Waking
symptoms Bedtime symptoms Yes      No Yes 34 34 No 32 19

Explanation / Answer

a)percent of the students have lasting waking-life symptoms=(34+32)*100/119 =55.46%

b)percent of the students have both waking-life and bedtime symptoms=34*100/119 =28.57%

c)Null Hypothesis:H0: There is no relationship between waking and bedtime symptoms.

Alternative Hypothesis:Ha: There is a relationship between waking and bedtime symptoms.

applying chi square goodness of ft test:

X2=1.916

df=1

p vlaue=0.166

as p value is higher

We do not have enough evidence to conclude that there is a relationship.

Observed O Yes(walking No(walking Total Yes(bed time) 34 34 68 No(bed time) 32 19 51 Total 66 53 119 Expected E=rowtotal*column total/grand total Yes(walking No(walking Total Yes(bed time) 37.714 30.286 68 No(bed time) 28.286 22.714 51 Total 66 53 119 chi square =(O-E)^2/E Yes(walking No(walking Total Yes(bed time) 0.366 0.456 0.821 No(bed time) 0.488 0.607 1.095 Total 0.854 1.063 1.916