Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

The following data are the morning and evening temperatures for three Michigan c

ID: 3181303 • Letter: T

Question

The following data are the morning and evening temperatures for three Michigan cities for four consecutive days in October. Enter the table "as is" into Excel, and use the Analysis Tool Pack to run a Two-Way Analysis of Variance (with Replication). Use the entire table, including row and column titles as the data block. Print and analyze (written comment) the results. Are there significant differences between the cities? Are there significant differences from morning to evening? Are there significant interactions between locations and time of day? Overall, what can we conclude? We are running this analysis to select a site for planting an apple orchard. Suggest a few other variables that might be of interest.

Explanation / Answer

Answer:

Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

SUMMARY

Lansing

Ann Arbor

Grand Rapids

Total

Morning

Count

4

4

4

12

Sum

175

178

169

522

Average

43.75

44.5

42.25

43.5

Variance

30.25

17.66666667

29.58333333

22.09091

Evening

Count

4

4

4

12

Sum

229

238

235

702

Average

57.25

59.5

58.75

58.5

Variance

32.25

57.66666667

62.25

42.45455

Total

Count

8

8

8

Sum

404

416

404

Average

50.5

52

50.5

Variance

78.85714286

96.57142857

117.1428571

ANOVA

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Sample

1350

1

1350

35.26851

1.28E-05

4.413873

Columns

12

2

6

0.156749

0.856073

3.554557

Interaction

9

2

4.5

0.117562

0.889763

3.554557

Within

689

18

38.27777778

Total

2060

23

To test main effect cities,

Calculated F=0.1567, P=0.856 which is > 0.05 level. Ho is not Rejected.

We conclude that there is no mean difference between cities.

To test main effect Time,

Calculated F=0.35.268, P=0.000 which is < 0.05 level. Ho is Rejected.

We conclude that there is mean difference between morning and evening.

To test interaction effect,

Calculated F=0.1175, P=0.889 which is > 0.05 level. Ho is not Rejected.

We conclude that interaction effect is not significant.

Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

SUMMARY

Lansing

Ann Arbor

Grand Rapids

Total

Morning

Count

4

4

4

12

Sum

175

178

169

522

Average

43.75

44.5

42.25

43.5

Variance

30.25

17.66666667

29.58333333

22.09091

Evening

Count

4

4

4

12

Sum

229

238

235

702

Average

57.25

59.5

58.75

58.5

Variance

32.25

57.66666667

62.25

42.45455

Total

Count

8

8

8

Sum

404

416

404

Average

50.5

52

50.5

Variance

78.85714286

96.57142857

117.1428571

ANOVA

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Sample

1350

1

1350

35.26851

1.28E-05

4.413873

Columns

12

2

6

0.156749

0.856073

3.554557

Interaction

9

2

4.5

0.117562

0.889763

3.554557

Within

689

18

38.27777778

Total

2060

23

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote