Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

A group of clinical physicians is performing tests on patients to determine the

ID: 3175503 • Letter: A

Question

A group of clinical physicians is performing tests on patients to determine the effectiveness of a new antihypertensive drug. Patients with high blood pressure were randomly chosen and then randomly assigned to either the control group (which received a well-established antihypertensive) or the treatment group (which received the new drug). The doctors noted the proportion of patients whose blood pressure was reduced to a normal level within 1 year.

GROUP

PROPORTION

THAT IMPROVED

NUMBER OF PATIENTS

Treatment

0.45

120

Control

0.32

150

            a.         State appropriate hypotheses to determine whether the proportion of patients that showed blood pressure improvement using the new drug (treatment group) is significantly different than the proportion that improved using the older drug (control group).

                        Ho :

                        H1 :

            b.         Calculate the test statistic for the above test.

Can the null hypothesis be rejected?If so, at what significance level?Complete the table.

Value of

Critical values

Reject H0?

0.10

0.05

0.01

Make an appropriate statement to interpret your results.

GROUP

PROPORTION

THAT IMPROVED

NUMBER OF PATIENTS

Treatment

0.45

120

Control

0.32

150

Explanation / Answer

Given that,
sample one, n1 =120, p1= x1/n1=0.45
sample two, n2 =150, p2= x2/n2=0.32
null, Ho: p1 = p2
alternate, H1: p1 != p2
we use test statistic (z) = (p1-p2)/(p^q^(1/n1+1/n2))
zo =(0.45-0.32)/sqrt((0.378*0.622(1/120+1/150))
zo =2.189
| zo | =2.189

ANSWERS
---------------
null, Ho: p1 = p2
alternate, H1: p1 != p2
test statistic: 2.189


level of significance, = 0.1
from standard normal table, two tailed z /2 =
since our test is two-tailed
reject Ho, if zo < -1.645 OR if zo > 1.645
critical value
the value of |z | at los 0.1% is 1.645
we got |zo| =2.189 & | z | =1.645
make decision
hence value of | zo | > | z | and here we reject Ho


level of significance, = 0.05
from standard normal table, two tailed z /2 =
since our test is two-tailed
reject Ho, if zo < -1.96 OR if zo > 1.96
critical value
the value of |z | at los 0.05% is 1.96
we got |zo| =2.189 & | z | =1.96
make decision
hence value of | zo | > | z | and here we reject Ho
p-value: two tailed ( double the one tail ) - Ha : ( p != 2.1893 ) = 0.0286
hence value of p0.05 > 0.0286,here we reject Ho


level of significance, = 0.01
from standard normal table, two tailed z /2 =
since our test is two-tailed
reject Ho, if zo < -2.576 OR if zo > 2.576
critical value
the value of |z | at los 0.01% is 2.576
we got |zo| =2.189 & | z | =2.576
make decision
hence value of |zo | < | z | and here we do not reject Ho

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote