Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

the spss file can be downloaded through this link http://www.mediafire.com/file/

ID: 3173988 • Letter: T

Question

the spss file can be downloaded through this link http://www.mediafire.com/file/p29xzx63694rxsh/QOL.sav

You should consider the following instructions when answering the assignment questions:

For confidence intervals:

Check all assumptions.

Interpret the results.

For testing hypothesis:

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

Check the necessary assumptions.

Report the P-value and the test statistic.

Make a conclusion statement in the words of the original problem.

1.Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the population proportion of Females and the population proportion of Males who have children .

2.Is there a significant difference between the population proportion of Females and the population proportion of males who have children? Use a = 0.05

3.Is there any significant difference in the Total Social Desirability Scale population means due to Sex? Use a = 0.05 as a level of significance

4.At 5% significance level and using the appropriate non-parametric test, can you conclude that Sex affects Total Social Desirability Scale?

5.Does the data support that Age (5 groups) affects Total Self Esteem Scale? Use a = 0.05

6.If differences exist in (5), use a multiple comparison method to determine which levels of Age (5 groups) differ.

7.Use the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test to test the equality of the Total Perceived Stress Scale medians among the 5 Age groups. Use a = 0.05

8.Use Two- Way ANOVA to test the main effects (Sex and Source of Stress) and the Interaction for the response variable Total Mastery Scale. Use = .05

9.Use the Chi-Square test of independence to test the relationship between Having Children and Source of Stress. Use = .05

Explanation / Answer

1. Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the population proportion of Females and the population proportion of Males who have children.

Solution:

From the given data, we have following information:

Sex * Child Cross tabulation

Count

Child

Total

YES

NO

Sex

MALES

80

104

184

FEMALES

105

149

254

Total

185

253

438

We are given

Confidence level = 95%

Number of items of interest (males) = 80

Sample size = 438

So, p1 = 80/438 = 0.182648402

In same way, we have p2 = 0.239726027

Critical Z value = 1.96

Confidence interval = (p1 – p2) -/+ Z*sqrt((p1q1/n1)+(p2q2/n2))

Confidence interval = (0.1826 – 0.2397) -/+ 1.96*sqrt((0.1826*(1 – 0.1826)/438)+(0.2397*(1 – 0.2397)/438))

Confidence interval = -0.05707763 -/+ 0.0539

Lower limit = -0.05707763 - 0.0539 = -0.1110

Upper limit = -0.05707763 + 0.0539 = -0.0032

2. Is there a significant difference between the population proportion of Females and the population proportion of males who have children? Use a = 0.05

Solution:

Null hypothesis: H0: There is no any significant difference in the population proportion of females and the population proportion of males who have children.

Alternative hypothesis: Ha: There is a significant difference in the population proportion of females and the population proportion of males who have children.

We are given

Confidence level = 95%

Number of items of interest (males) = 80

Sample size = 438

So, p1 = 80/438 = 0.182648402

In same way, we have p2 = 0.239726027

Test statistic = Z = = (p1 – p2) / sqrt((p1q1/n1)+(p2q2/n2))

Test statistic = (0.1826 – 0.2397)/sqrt((0.1826*(1 – 0.1826)/438)+(0.2397*(1 – 0.2397)/438))

Test statistic = -2.0695

P-value = 0.0385

Alpha value = 0.05

P-value < Alpha value

So, we reject the null hypothesis that there is no any significant difference in the population proportion of females and the population proportion of males who have children.

We conclude that there is sufficient evidence that there is a significant difference in the population proportion of females and the population proportion of males who have children.

3. Is there any significant difference in the Total Social Desirability Scale population means due to Sex? Use a = 0.05 as a level of significance

Solution:

Null hypothesis: H0: There is no any significant difference in the total social desirability scale population means due to sex.

Alternative hypothesis: Ha: There is a significant difference in the total social desirability scale population means due to sex.

The test by using SPSS is given as below:

Group Statistics

Sex

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Total social desirability

MALES

183

5.04

2.000

.148

FEMALES

250

5.50

2.056

.130

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F

Sig.

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower

Upper

Total social desirability

Equal variances assumed

.047

.828

-2.288

431

.023

-.452

.198

-.841

-.064

Equal variances not assumed

-2.297

398.328

.022

-.452

.197

-.839

-.065

We get p-value = 0.023 < alpha value 0.05, so we reject the null hypothesis that There is no any significant difference in the total social desirability scale population means due to sex.

There is sufficient evidence that there is a significant difference in the total social desirability scale population means due to sex.

4. At 5% significance level and using the appropriate non-parametric test, can you conclude that Sex affects Total Social Desirability Scale?

Solution:

Here, we have to use

Mann-Whitney Test

Null hypothesis: H0: There is no any significant difference in the total social desirability scale population means due to sex.

Alternative hypothesis: Ha: There is a significant difference in the total social desirability scale population means due to sex.

It is given as below

Ranks

Sex

N

Mean Rank

Sum of Ranks

Total social desirability

MALES

183

200.84

36753.50

FEMALES

250

228.83

57207.50

Total

433

Test Statistics

Total social desirability

Mann-Whitney U

19917.500

Wilcoxon W

36753.500

Z

-2.323

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

.020

a. Grouping Variable: Sex

P-value = 0.020 < Alpha = 0.05, so we reject the null hypothesis that there is no any significant difference in the total social desirability scale population means due to sex.

There is sufficient evidence that there is a significant difference in the total social desirability scale population means due to sex.

Sex * Child Cross tabulation

Count

Child

Total

YES

NO

Sex

MALES

80

104

184

FEMALES

105

149

254

Total

185

253

438