Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Fifty fifth-grade students from each of four city schools were given a standardi

ID: 3156116 • Letter: F

Question

Fifty fifth-grade students from each of four city schools were given a standardized fifth-grade reading test. After grading, each student was rated as satisfactory or not satisfactory in reading ability, with the following results:
Each number represent number of unsatisfactory students in each city school. 7, 10, 13, 6.
Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the percentage of fifth-grade students with an unsatisfactory reading ability varies from school to school? Use 1% level of significance level.

Solution:

At least one proportion differs from at least one another. Test statistics: ______
Degree of freedom: 3
Critical value: _______
Therefore, we can/ cannot ? reject the null hypothesis that reading ability for the fifth-grades as measured by this test does not vary from school to school.

Explanation / Answer

Fifty fifth-grade students from each of four city schools were given a standardized fifth-grade reading test. After grading, each student was rated as satisfactory or not satisfactory in reading ability, with the following results:
Each number represent number of unsatisfactory students in each city school. 7, 10, 13, 6.
Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the percentage of fifth-grade students with an unsatisfactory reading ability varies from school to school? Use 1% level of significance level.

Solution:

At least one proportion differs from at least one another. Test statistics: 4.065
Degree of freedom: 3
Critical value: 11.345
Therefore, we cannot reject the null hypothesis that reading ability for the fifth-grades as measured by this test does not vary from school to school.

Chi-Square Test

Observed Frequencies

Column variable

Calculations

Row variable

C1

C2

C3

C4

Total

fo-fe

R1

7

10

13

6

36

-2

1

4

-3

R2

43

40

37

44

164

2

-1

-4

3

Total

50

50

50

50

200

Expected Frequencies

Column variable

Row variable

C1

C2

C3

C4

Total

(fo-fe)^2/fe

R1

9

9

9

9

36

0.4444

0.1111

1.7778

1.0000

R2

41

41

41

41

164

0.0976

0.0244

0.3902

0.2195

Total

50

50

50

50

200

Data

Level of Significance

0.01

Number of Rows

2

Number of Columns

4

Degrees of Freedom

3

Results

Critical Value

11.345

Chi-Square Test Statistic

4.0650

p-Value

0.2545

Do not reject the null hypothesis

Chi-Square Test

Observed Frequencies

Column variable

Calculations

Row variable

C1

C2

C3

C4

Total

fo-fe

R1

7

10

13

6

36

-2

1

4

-3

R2

43

40

37

44

164

2

-1

-4

3

Total

50

50

50

50

200

Expected Frequencies

Column variable

Row variable

C1

C2

C3

C4

Total

(fo-fe)^2/fe

R1

9

9

9

9

36

0.4444

0.1111

1.7778

1.0000

R2

41

41

41

41

164

0.0976

0.0244

0.3902

0.2195

Total

50

50

50

50

200

Data

Level of Significance

0.01

Number of Rows

2

Number of Columns

4

Degrees of Freedom

3

Results

Critical Value

11.345

Chi-Square Test Statistic

4.0650

p-Value

0.2545

Do not reject the null hypothesis

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Chat Now And Get Quote