Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

A recent sample of adults was asked their opinions regarding government spending

ID: 3133850 • Letter: A

Question

A recent sample of adults was asked their opinions regarding government spending on health and government spending on law enforcement. The data are in the table below.

Law Enforcement Spending

Health Spending   

Increase

Decrease

Total

Increase

292

25

317

Decrease

14

9

23

Total

306

34

340

Test whether increased spending is favored in one area. Use a 5% level of significance.  1) Write out the appropriate null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis; 2) Calculate the test statistic (show your work); 3) Give your conclusion including a comparison to alpha or the critical value

Law Enforcement Spending

Explanation / Answer

1.

Here,

Ho: Increased spending is not favored in one area.
Ha: Increased spending is favored in one area.

**********************************

2.

Doing an Expected Value Chart,          
          

          
Using chi^2 = Sum[(O - E)^2/E],          
          
chi^2 =    23.25942181 [ANSWER, TEST STATISTIC]

***************************************************
          
With df = (a - 1)(b - 1), where a and b are the number of categories of each variable,          
          
a =    2      
b =    2      
          
df =    1      
          
Thus, the critical value is          
          
significance level =    0.05      
          
chi^2(critical) =    3.841458821      
          
As chi^2 > 3.841, we   REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS.      
          
Thus, there is significant evidence that increased spending is favored in one area at 0.05 level. [CONCLUSION]

Health Spending    Increase Decrease Total Increase 285.3 31.7 317 Decrease 20.7 2.3 23 Total 306 34 340
Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote