1) Fallacies of Composition are a type of fallacy that deals with the following.
ID: 306057 • Letter: 1
Question
1)
Fallacies of Composition are a type of fallacy that deals with the following.
A vague or unclear word or phrase
A grammatical error that leads to more than one conclusion
An argument is changed based on an emphasized phrase
A member of a group is wrongly assumed to be a characteristic of the whole group
2)
The following is an example of which type of fallacy: “I understand that Canadians are very nice people. Therefore, Derek, who is from Vancouver, must be really nice.”
Fallacy of Composition
Fallacy of Division
Amphiboly
Fallacy of accent
3)
Which type of fallacy best describes the following claim: "I'm opposed to same sex marriages. Proponents of same sex marriage want to destroy traditional marriage and make homosexual marriage the norm."
Straw Man
Red Herring
Personal Attack
Appeal to Ignorance
4)
The statement, "UFOs obviously don't exist. No one has been able to actually prove that they do exist,” is a type of which fallacy?
Hasty Generalization
Appeal to ignorance
Popular Appeal
Personal Attack
5)
An Appeal to Force is a type of fallacy that is characterized as…
A threat or use of force in an attempt to get the other person to back down
An attempt to gain support for an argument based on evoking a feeling
An appeal made to the opinion of the majority to gain support for the conclusion
An argument that states that something is true because no one has proved it to be false.
6)
An Appeal to Pity is a type of fallacy that is characterized as…
A threat or use of force in an attempt to get the other person to back down
An attempt to gain support for an argument based on evoking a feeling
An appeal made to the opinion of the majority to gain support for the conclusion
An argument that states that something is true because no one has proved it to be false.
7)
Equivocation is a type of fallacy that deals with the following.
A vague or unclear word or phrase
A grammatical error that leads to more than one conclusion
An argument is changed based on an emphasized phrase
A member of a group is wrongly assumed to be a characteristic of the whole group.
8)
The fallacy of Scare Tactics is also known as:
Ad Hominem
Appeal to Force
Appeal to Pity
Popular Appeal
Explanation / Answer
Fallacies of Composition are a type of fallacy that deals with the following.
A vague or unclear word or phrase
A grammatical error that leads to more than one conclusion
An argument is changed based on an emphasized phrase
A member of a group is wrongly assumed to be a characteristic of the whole group
The following is an example of which type of fallacy: “I understand that Canadians are very nice people. Therefore, Derek, who is from Vancouver, must be really nice.”
Fallacy of Composition
Fallacy of Division
Amphiboly
Fallacy of accent
Which type of fallacy best describes the following claim: "I'm opposed to same sex marriages. Proponents of same sex marriage want to destroy traditional marriage and make homosexual marriage the norm."
Straw Man
Red Herring
Personal Attack
Appeal to Ignorance
The statement, "UFOs obviously don't exist. No one has been able to actually prove that they do exist,” is a type of which fallacy?
Hasty Generalization
Appeal to ignorance
Popular Appeal
Personal Attack
An Appeal to Force is a type of fallacy that is characterized as…
A threat or use of force in an attempt to get the other person to back down
An attempt to gain support for an argument based on evoking a feeling
An appeal made to the opinion of the majority to gain support for the conclusion
An argument that states that something is true because no one has proved it to be false.
An Appeal to Pity is a type of fallacy that is characterized as…
A threat or use of force in an attempt to get the other person to back down
An attempt to gain support for an argument based on evoking a feeling
An appeal made to the opinion of the majority to gain support for the conclusion
An argument that states that something is true because no one has proved it to be false.
Equivocation is a type of fallacy that deals with the following.
A vague or unclear word or phrase
A grammatical error that leads to more than one conclusion
An argument is changed based on an emphasized phrase
A member of a group is wrongly assumed to be a characteristic of the whole group.
The fallacy of Scare Tactics is also known as:
Ad Hominem
Appeal to Force
Appeal to Pity
Popular Appeal
Explanation:
A legitimate deception is a mistake in thinking sufficiently regular to warrant an extravagant name. Formal false notions are breakdowns by the method you say something, the thoughts are requested wrong by one means or another. Their frame isn't right.
Casual deceptions, similar to the ones underneath, need to do with what you are stating (the "substance" of a contention). The thoughts may be masterminded right, yet something you said isn't exactly right. The substance isn't right.
False notions are basic errors in rational that will challenge the rationale of your contention. False notions can be moreover ill-conceived arguments or unimportant emphases, and are frequently distinguished in light of the detail that they need confirm that backings their claim.
A legitimate paradox is basically an imperfect contention or mistake in thinking. Consistent false notions are issues in the manner in which that an essayist has built a contention. What is essential is that you're ready to spot and fix an imperfect contention when you've influenced one and, even better, that you to keep away from flawed rationale in any case.
Most scholastic composition undertakings expect you to make a contention that is, to display explanations behind a specific claim or translation you are advancing. You might have been informed that you have to make your contentions more sensible or more grounded. Furthermore, you may have stressed that you essentially aren't a coherent individual or pondered what it implies for a contention to be solid. Figuring out how to influence the best contentions you to can is a progressing procedure, yet it isn't unthinkable: "Being intelligent" is something anybody can do, with training.
Every contention you make is made out of premises (this is a term for articulations that express your reasons or confirmation) that are organized in the correct method to help your decision (the principle claim or elucidation you are putting forth). You can make your contentions more grounded by:
-utilizing great premises (ones you have justifiable reason motivation to accept are both valid and important to the current issue),
-ensuring your premises give great help to your decision (and not some other conclusion, or no conclusion by any means),
-watching that you have tended to the most essential or pertinent parts of the issue (that will be, that your premises and conclusion center around what is extremely vital to the issue), and
-not making claims that are so solid or clearing that you can't generally bolster them.
You additionally must make certain that you exhibit the greater part of your thoughts in a precise manner that peruses can take after. See our presents on contention and association for a few hints that will enhance your contentions.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.