As reproductive technology advanced, headlines announcing \"Couple Battles over
ID: 306046 • Letter: A
Question
As reproductive technology advanced, headlines announcing "Couple Battles over Frozen Embryos" became more and more commonplace. For example, in the 1980s a man went to court and succeeded in preventing his ex-wife from using their frozen embryos to become pregnant. He maintained that after he and his wife had divorced, he no longer wanted to become a parent, and should not be forced to do so against his will In 1998, a divorced woman in New Jersey won a legal battle with her ex-husband over custody of severn frozen embryos the couple had created in vitro while still married. The wife wanted to have the embryos destroyed, while the ex-husband argued his right to adopt his own embryos to be implanted in a future part ner or donated to an infertile couple. 30. In your opinion, should frozen embryos be considered property to be awarded during a divorce? Why or why not? ex-wife is implanted with the embryos and becomes pregnant at a later date? Explain your answer the wishes of the ex-husband or ex-wife? Why or why not? 31. Should a man who loses custody of frozen embryos in a lawsuit be responsible for child support if his 32. Should the husband or wife who wins custody of frozen embryos be allowed to destroy them, against
Explanation / Answer
1)Frozen embryo the most advanced medical practice now a days faces problem when there is a breakup of relationship. It naturally should not be awarded to both when they no longer are together because it is the property of both and one can't be shown partiality.
31) No the man is not responsible for the child. It will grow on the basis of single parent after the divorce.
32)After custody by anyone it can be destroyed legally against the wish of ex partner because they no longer can charge for it.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.