Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

KING WANTS VOTING RIGHTS NOW! Pres In the South, most African-American adults co

ID: 3057114 • Letter: K

Question

KING WANTS VOTING RIGHTS NOW! Pres In the South, most African-American adults could not Segregationists did not want voting rights for blacks he oe they did not want black politicians. The segregationists reading and writing tests to the blacks who wanted to Bat the tests were impossible. Most blacks failed the tes they could not vote. his arc list ser his In 1965, Selma, Alabama had an adult population of almost 30,000. Half were black but only 333 of them vote. The worst segregationi could st states of Alabama, Louisiana, in and Mississippi did not have voting rights for blacks. Kitne to organize protest marches in Selma. They began on January 18, 1965, when he led 400 blacks to decided ro the courthouse. King politely asked to put the marchers names on the voting list. They were told to leave. They marched to a big hotel. Black people walked through its entrance for the first time. There, they signed their names to the voting list. This was a very small step toward success. As the marchers went toward the courthouse on January 25, 1965, the city's law officers violently attacked a female marcher. Photographers were waiting for this and took photos for the nation's newspapers. On February 1, police arrested King, Abernathy, and 250 marchers. Inside jail, King continued to give orders to the marchers through his assistant, Andrew Young. Marches continued the next day, February 2. That afternoon, 500 schoolchildren were arrested. This did not stop the marchers Police arrested 3,000 people and put them in jail. King's arrest was in all of the newspapers across tho country. Television news reporters arrived in Selma. King was 30

Explanation / Answer

Okay so the article brings up some interesting questions that I am presuming are required to be answered in terms of their statistical significance.

Would violence lead to on obliteration of the civil rights movement? Or should the principles of ahisma/non-violence pivotal to achieving the goals of the civil rights movement.

Historically speaking violence has incurred more violence. But it certainly has had a more subtle chance of getting things done. So the ideologies of king who wanted equality for whites and black through non-violence were certainly achieved through a Peaceful movement, that took years to cultivate with a lot of struggles. It can be argued that non peaceful methods would have been more successful in such a scenario however the world would have been a dystopian place for the struggle period.

After the assassination of king, influenced by violence, when the civil rights movement seemed on the verge of collapse,it actually created a domino effect that got reflected in achieving the success of this civil rights movement.