Logic Problem What fallacy/violation of the rules of validity is present in the

Question

Logic Problem

What fallacy/violation of the rules of validity is present in the following categorical syllogism? Two negative premises. Undistributed middle term. Universal premises, particular conclusion. None of the above. Write an EAO-2 categorical syllogism (use the variables P, S, & M). List the four standard form categorical propositions: All S are P & Some S are P Some S are not P & All S are P No S is P & Some S are not P Do a truth table for the following propositional statements: A Conjunction (use P and Q]

Explanation / Answer

32. (d) None of the Above.

Because it contains one Universal premesis, one particular affirmative premises and conclusion as particular negative.

33. EAO-2 categorical syllogism

No S are M (E)

All P are M (A)

Some S are not P (O)

34. Four forms of categorical proposition:

(1) All S are P (A proposition)

(2) No S are P ( E proposition)

(3) Some S are P (I proposition)

(4) Some S are not P (O proposition)

35. All S are P & Some S are P ---- True

36. Some S are not P & All S are P ---- False

37. No S is P & Some S are not P ----- True

Truth table for the following proposition statement:

1. A Conjunction (use P & Q)

All are solved.

P Q P*Q T T T T F F F T F F F F

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse L
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.