Some scientists worry that the fractured experience typical of the internet coul

Question

Some scientists worry that the fractured experience typical of the internet could rob developing reader so crucial skills. Reading a book, and talking that time to ruminate and make inferences and engage the imaginational processing, is more cognitivelly enriching, without doubt, than the short little bits that you might get if you are into the 30 seconds digital mode, said Ken Pugh, a cognitive neuroscientist at Yale who has studied brain scan of children reading. Question: On your on words, what does this quote mean? Do you agree or disagree?

Explanation / Answer

Yes,I completely agree to what Ken Pugh has stated.The internet learning mostly is concerned with videos.The videos are processed 60,000 times faster in the brain than actually reading that content.The cognitive system has to work really hard to process information from reading a text than watching videos.Humans are hardwired to avoid demanding cognitive strain,so this tendency towards laziness will more often than not ,invite us to choose information that is easier to process than the form which puts us do a lot more effort.

Reading articles and watching vidoes require two different brain functions .When we read ,the process involves us to be actively involved .The brain gets a much better workout when reading than watching vidoes,and the process requies a longer attention span and deeper cognitive efforts.Reading is active,when we read we just not look at the words,we create thoughts about that content , activating our mental structures.Reading requires production of inner voice which dials up our attention span.

Watching a video though passive , is much less demanding and more of an automatic process,asking a lot less effort on behalf of the person watching.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.