@cFF DH o , ?? Informed consent should not be required for scientist to use disc

Question

@cFF DH o , ?? Informed consent should not be required for scientist to use discard human tissue-Saved to my Mac Q- Search in Document Home Insert Design Layout References Mailings Review View Share A Heading 1 Styles Pane Informed consent should not be required for scientist to use discard human tissue? Pros (This part already done) Unwanted parts can be used for research (will be discarded anyway, and will instead be put into use Cons (Need to do this part) Illegal profiting las in money) from discarded human tissue (other profiting from their tissues) What are Tissues? Organic material removed from a living individual. Including biological samples For example, Blood Saliva Discarded surgical ssue Cord Blood as cadaver 5sue or autopsy specimens don't quality as HSR Why are tissues an issue? The Researcher's Issue . An important resource for biomedical discovery and education Even more valuable becouse of genatic research Will be discarded anyway, and wil instead be put to use Why are tissues an issue? People care are concemed about Ownership of specimens How their tissues are used Genetic testing and future Others profiting from their ssues Page 1 of 1 58 words English (Australia) E -, E -a Focus + 116%

Explanation / Answer

Cons

The tissue collected for research is actually not used in research purpose they are selling in illegal market.        The collected samples are not recorded properly .
Families have given less information and rights to harvest tissuse from dead ones.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse #
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.