D. Yes, because james is concealing the termite infestation from Mikhael. QUESTI
ID: 2658288 • Letter: D
Question
D. Yes, because james is concealing the termite infestation from Mikhael. QUESTION 20 Concerning contract capacity, which is true? A A person who lacks capacity to contract may nevertheless be compelled to pay the reasonable value for necessities furnished by another party B. The defense of intoxication is an excellent contract defense roughly equivalent in quality to infancy and incompetency. oC-One who entered into a contract while intoxicated need not later disaffirn the contractin order to avoid being bound by t, because such a contract is vold D. As a general rule, an adult's contract with a minor is voidable at the option of elther party answersExplanation / Answer
20 b
Option A is incorrect because a person who is incapable of entering into the contract cannot be forced to fulfill it. Option C is incorrect because an intoxicated person has the right to disaffirm the contract and it is voidable but not void. Option d is incorrect because a contract with a minor is void.
Option B is the correct option because a contract in which people were intoxicated is voidable and hence provides an excellent contract defence.
25 d
Under the mailbox rule acceptance of an offer is deemed as soon as the acceptance is dispatched. However if the acceptance is lost or Never reaches the offer it is effective only upon receipt. In this case if the acceptance is not in the authorised mode it makes no difference.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.