I need a writing discussion just one page wireiess carriers Dack DIll to mak it
ID: 2576054 • Letter: I
Question
I need a writing discussion just one page
wireiess carriers Dack DIll to mak it easier to install 5G antennas Companies want access to Hundreds of thousands of these small telephone poles, streetlights and rights of way across Pa. Dated Aug. 7, the letter said that the Stle soie heinstaled across the Uneproposed legislatiog ig not in the best pested interests of Pennsylvania." North Wales, million The goal of this is not to deal with [big the city of Reading and other Pennsylvania t cell] towers," state Rep. Nick Miccarelli (R., local governments passed, or are consider- expen: Delaware County), a primary sponsor of ing passing, resolutions opposing H.B. 1620. the H.B. 1620, said last w cells that would go in existing structures, Smithfield Township in Monroe County, Tha BY BoB FERNANDEZ Of The Philadelphia Inquirer (TNS) Wireless carriers are pushing controver like poles and street lights sial legislation in Harrisburg Many people in Pennsylvania "can't get so much author- enters s to cellular service, let alone these faster ity away from local municipalities. "We propo robbery" because it takes streetlights and publicly speeds. This would go a long way in have to hav ellphone dead zones and Last month, a public hearing was got to be fair on both sides." tha rightsor wayars Peanay ranias setfhinghiese probd eno, a long way in mav enoi maybe not all zoning control" he said. "It's fund prepare for next generation 5G services. scheduled in the Pennsylvania Hot Lovenheim also is concerned about the on small cells. He fears that municipalities inves m carriers to make it easier to boost cancelled onsumer Affairs committee but then long-torm economic consequences of theHa capacity on wireless networks for data- Farry said that some towns appear to could lose their cable franchise revenue and tion services such as SG for stream- roposed Pennsylvania legislation "overzealous" in approving the zoning for the small cells. But Farry added that the At the same time, many local o streams if c speed wireless services offered by n fticials are livid about the bill, saying it could despoil supporters and opponents need to find many towns' character and even constitu- "common ground. Local municipal officials have balked at distributed-antenna sys- HB. 1620 in its current form, believing that "strips municipalities of virtually all of milli tems, or an outdoor mesh of small cells it would strip them of zoning authority thei about the size of pizza boxes, will bring over small cells that could include new towers and They could offer high- pete with Comcast Corp. and other cable Illinois, Wisconsin utility poles in public rights of way. Those and internet services to com- poles could be placed in historic areas r the Cohen Law Gr presen owntown or in neighborhoods without wireless, and ssues Cohen said that municipal officials do Lancaster officials have opposed a to put more than 70 small-cell antennas for wireless services on big new poles smack in also are considering for the "huge surge in demand for wireless diffe services." But town o so- calle carrie that the proposed bill would look god-awful with these towers all over rs have told Pennsylvania the city's historic areas. "The city would see orderly dep band Linda Kelleher Reading city clerk,H ireless build-out so Charlotte Katzenmoyer, the city's director said that Reading is not just oning that they won't have to have file z takes time and can cost a river of permitting proposed legislation could strip them of vania Municipal League, sent a jointly things with care. We don't think the utility C of public works, told the Inquirer and Daily about but its for each new small cell, whi 5G subsequent The heads of the Pennsylvania ssocia equipment. tions for township supervisors, boroughs This time is not the last hurrah," she and commissic outs a officials fear the as well as the Pennsyl- said of 5G. You really need to zoning powers over small cells to telecom signed letter opposing H.B 1620 to its company is the best one to make these HarkExplanation / Answer
The article talks about a new legislation that has been implemented in Harrisburg. This new legislation will give wireless carriers unlimited access to telephone poles in Pennsylvania, making it easier for them to install 5G antennas and roll out their 5G services going forward.
Although the legislation spells good times for telecom companies as well as subscribers it is being opposed by several local officials. These officials believe that such legislation could potentially despoil the innate character of the town. Officials are also worried because the legislation, if passed, will deprive them of zoning powers.
One should look at the new possibilities and avenues that this legislation will throw up. For starters it will be of immense benefit to those people who can’t get cellular services. It will also benefit those people who can’t get fast speed internet. As the legislation will pave way for telecom advancement and increased access local municipal officials should not absolutely oppose the legislation but should seek a middle path with the policy makers so that their concerns are addressed meaningfully. Their main concern is getting stripped of all zoning controls. This can be worked out with the policy makers and the legislation can be tweaked to ensure that officials still have some zoning control in future as well. Secondly there are issues with regards to municipalities losing cable franchise revenue streams. The municipal bodies can easily make up for this loss by augmented revenues from increased user charges for use of poles and other such assets owned by municipal bodies.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.