Becton Labs, Inc., produces various chemical compounds for industrial use. One c
ID: 2515514 • Letter: B
Question
Becton Labs, Inc., produces various chemical compounds for industrial use. One compound, called Fludex, is prepared using an elaborate distilling process. The company has developed standard costs for one unit of Fludex, as follows:
During November, the following activity was recorded relative to production of Fludex:
a. Materials purchased, 12,000 ounces at a cost of $259,800.
b. There was no beginning inventory of materials; however, at the end of the month, 3,100 ounces of material remained in ending inventory.
c. The company employs 25 lab technicians to work on the production of Fludex. During November, they worked an average of 130 hours at an average rate of $12.00 per hour.
d. Variable manufacturing overhead is assigned to Fludex on the basis of direct labor-hours. Variable manufacturing overhead costs during November totaled $4,200.
e. During November, 4,000 good units of Fludex were produced .
Required:
1. For direct materials:
a. Compute the price and quantity variances. (Input all amounts as positive values. Indicate the effect of each variance by selecting "F" for favorable, "U" for unfavorable, and "None" for no effect (i.e, zero variance).)
b. The materials were purchased from a new supplier who is anxious to enter into a long-term purchase contract. Would you recommend that the company sign the contract?
2. For direct labor:
a. Compute the rate and efficiency variances. (Input all amounts as positive values. Indicate the effect of each variance by selecting "F" for favorable, "U" for unfavorable, and "None" for no effect (i.e, zero variance).)
b. In the past, the 25 technicians employed in the production of Fludex consisted of 4 senior technicians and 21 assistants. During November, the company experimented with fewer senior technicians and more assistants in order to save costs. Would you recommend that the new labor mix be continued?
3. Compute the variable overhead rate and efficiency variances. (Input all amounts as positive values. Indicate the effect of each variance by selecting "F" for favorable, "U" for unfavorable, and "None" for no effect (i.e, zero variance).)
Standard Quantity Standard Priceor Rate Standard Cost Direct materials 2.20 ounces $ 23.00 per ounce $ 50.60 Direct labor 0.60 hours $ 14.00 per hour 8.40 Variable manufacturing overhead 0.60 hours $ 2.50 per hour 1.50 $ 60.50
Explanation / Answer
Explanation:
1.
a.
In the solution below, the materials price variance is computed on the entire amount of materials purchased whereas the materials quantity variance is computed only on the amount of materials used in production:
Actual Quantity
of Input,
at Actual Price
Actual Quantity of
Input, at
Standard Price
Standard Quantity Allowed
for Output,
at Standard Price
(AQ × AP)
(AQ × SP)
(SQ × SP)
8,900 ounces ×
$23.00 per ounce
8,800 ounces* ×
$23.00 per ounce
$259,800
= $2,04,700
= $2,02,400
Price variance, $16,200 F
12,000 ounces × $23.00 per ounce
= $276,000
Quantity Variance,
$2,300 U
*4,000 units × 2.2 ounces per unit = 8,800 ounces
Materials price variance:
Actual Price = $2,59,800 ÷ 12,000 ounces = $21.65 per ounce
b.
Yes, the contract should be signed. The new price of $21,65 per ounce is lower than $23.00 per ounce, which resulted in a favourable price variance of $16,200. Also, the material of the new supplier appears to be good for production as it has small materials quantity variance.
2.
a.
Actual Hours
of Input,
at the Actual Rate
Actual Hours of
Input, at
the Standard Rate
Standard Hours Allowed
for Output,
at the Standard Rate
(AH × AR)
(AH × SR)
(SH × SR)
3,250 hours* ×
$12 per hour
3,250 hours ×
$14.00 per hour
2,400 hours** ×
$14.00 per hour
= $39,000
= $45,500
= $33,600
Rate Variance,
$6,500 U
Efficiency Variance,
$10,200 U
Spending variance, $16,700 U
*25 technicians × 130 hours per technician = 3,250 hours
**4,000 units × 0.60 hours per technician = 2,400 hours
b.
No, the new labor mix probably should be continued. as it decreases the average hourly labor cost from $14.00 to $12.00, causing a $6,500 unfavourable labor rate variance, and again by a large unfavourable labor efficiency variance for the month. Thus, the new labor mix increases overall labor costs.
In the solution below, the materials price variance is computed on the entire amount of materials purchased whereas the materials quantity variance is computed only on the amount of materials used in production:
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.