According to the case of Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney health System
ID: 243622 • Letter: A
Question
According to the case of Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney health System explain how the transaction was structured and why?According to the case of Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney health System explain how the transaction was structured and why?
According to the case of Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney health System explain how the transaction was structured and why?
According to the case of Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney health System explain how the transaction was structured and why?
Explanation / Answer
Phoebe Putney Health System , it owns and operates on the basis of not for profit hospitals, speciality It offers services in the area of cancer care,heart and vascular care, woman and children care, gastro enterology problems, orthopedics, sports medicine, home care,hospice, pain management, diabetic care and a wide variety of disease condition.
It focuses on high quality and affordability
It has two non profit corporation to manage merged together Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital and Palmyra Hospital.Palmyra is a subsidary of HCA.Because of financing and antitrust concerns.So the transaction was structured.The FTC sought to enjoin the transaction in U.S.Midlle court
Therefore Federal Anti trust law looks upon any liability that is caused to in patients in health care system.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.