Key Players; Dr. David Howard, CEO: As the President and CEO of the hospital sys
ID: 242246 • Letter: K
Question
Key Players;
Dr. David Howard, CEO: As the President and CEO of the hospital system, Dr. David Howard represents the hospital administration and the board of directors. Dr. David Howard is no longer a practicing physician, and he last saw a patient five years ago. Dr.Howard is now having a meeting with Dr. Ben Jones and Dr. Jyoti Nasr regarding the patient care plan for Patient X, whose condition is worsening. Dr. David Howard asked both Ben and Jyoti: "Ben and Jyoti, I am concerned about the patient's worsening condition. After six days with us, are we positive that our plan of care is effective?"
Dr. Ben Jones: Practicing physician, who also serves as the organization's Chief Medical Informatics Officer (CMIO), Dr. Jones is a "near progressive" CMIO, who has the willingness to learn new evidence-proven methods but is, at times, hesitant to stand in front of the hospital's committees to expeditiously change the existing standard plans of care. Dr. Jones is the consulting physician for Patient X. His condition is getting worse. In regards to Dr. David Howard's question concerning Patient X, he replied, "David, I consulted with our specialists, and they agree that no change is necessary yet. While there's great EBM research out there, I suggest we reconvene in a day or two."
Dr. JyotiNasr, CNO: Ms. Jyoti Nasr, Ph.D. is the organization's Chief Nursing Officer. Dr. Nasr recently became the highest ranked nursing/patient-care administrator. In the meeting with Dr. Howard and Dr. Jones, Dr. Howard asked her about Patient X, "Jyoti, what are your thoughts? Are our nurses suggesting anything else?" Dr. Jyoti Nasr replied: "Dr. Howard, I agree with Ben that the current meds have not yet taken full effect. But it is concerning that things are getting worse. Ben and I discussed the EBM order set implemented at several academic medical centers, and we both wish we had taken it to the MEC (Medical Executive Committee) last month. Things change so rapidly nowadays, and this research, while new, is well documented and validated. But it's not yet approved by MEC...."
Dr. Howard, Dr. Jones, and Dr. Nasr: Dr. David Howard said, "I'd like you two to quickly confer with the consultants and come to my office at 7pm tonight to let me know your decision. If you tell me that we need to call an emergency MEC meeting via teleconference, so be it. Oh, and one more thing: You both know the Board's emphasis on quality of care. Any decision we make on Patient X's treatment plan or any similar complex case, must ensure we limit our organizational liability. Just because MEC has not met to approve the new EBM order-set, we may still face negligence charges. Our patients' safety comes first, so red-tape such as MEC not meeting can't be anyone's excuse.
Patient X was just seen by Dr. Ben Jones. The patient's condition is worsening after five days in the hospital. Dr. Ben Jones believes that a new treatment plan may be in order, but he would prefer to let the currently applied plan of care and order set. Dr. Ben Jones, as the organization's CMIO, subscribes to applying research and evidence-based Medicine (EBM), in everyday patient care situations, but Dr. Ben Jones is reluctant to replace the current order set with a new set of orders that has not yet been approved by the Medical Executive Committee. The patient's current plan of care is based on the standard order set in place. It was developed approximately five years ago by combining two very respected physicians' advice and experience. The dilemma faced by Dr. Ben Jones is whether to remain with the existing plan of care or to switch to the new but not yet approved plan of care based on EBM. Dr. Ben Jones, along with hospital CEO Dr. David Howard and Dr. Jyoti Nasr, the organization's chief nurse, are meeting to discuss the patient's progress. They need to make a decision based on their thoughts Your Assignment You are Dr. Jyoti Nasr, the organization's CNO, whose RNs are caring for the patient. While the specific patient plan of care is determined by the attending and consulting physicians, your hospital's CEO has asked you to contribute to the discussion. Your hospital takes a team approach to caring for patients and while your Medical Executive Committee has not yet approved the new EBM plan, you are faced with the dilemma of what to do for this particular You know that the consulting physicians subscribe to practicing medicine by using their experiences and not EBM. You now have to meet with the attending physician, who happens to also be your colleague leader over Medical Informatics. You know that your long-term relationship with Dr. Ben Jones must survive this challenge, and you are concerned about opposing his views or hesitations.Explanation / Answer
In evidence-based operate growth, instructors must crease indication to provision principled and legal choices. Conceivable ethical circumstances comprise classifying staff associates who are not intelligent to obtain the information and skills essential for safe and actual patient upkeep. If teachers recognize such staff memberships, they are morally indebted to take ladders to help them attain instructive purposes.
Though there seems to be prevalent sustenance of evidence-based medication as a foundation for balanced recommending, the trials to it are noteworthy and repeatedly defensible. A horde of influences other than indication drive scientific choice manufacture, counting patient partialities and social conditions, attendance of illness medication and drug medication connections, clinical knowledge, opposing stresses from more persistent scientific circumstances, advertising and publicity movement, and organization level medication strategies.
Evidence-based medication (EBM) can be distinct as the addition of best investigation indication with clinical know-how and patient standards. The recent changeover from specialist based medication to EBM has ambitious important variations in clinical practice, health investigation, and medical teaching. Evidence-based practice methods endure to upsurge in approval in health and human provision backgrounds in Australia and worldwide. As social workforces face burdens to evidence practice and defend consequences, the limits in applying an evidence based practice method to social work are challenged.
The contemporary paper classifies the topographies of evidence-based practice and minutes the potential welfares and confines of this method in social work. Discussions nearby the countryside of social work interferences, efficiency and evidence are studied. The current setting and climate manipulating the usage of investigation and other evidence in social exertion are deliberated. This also deliberates the location of qualitative, explanatory and critical thoughtful tactics in relative to evidence-based practice. Subjects for the upcoming of evidence-based practice in communal work are recognized, with the need for the occupation to inspect more carefully the association amid critical thoughtful and evidence-based methods to practice.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.