1. Were the studies to prevent vertical transmission of HIV in Africa really lik
ID: 200340 • Letter: 1
Question
1. Were the studies to prevent vertical transmission of HIV in Africa really like the Tuskegee Study? What was the same and what differed?
2. Knowledge of the Tuskegee Study has prevented many black patients from participating in medical research. Is it time now to get over that? If blacks don’t participate in medical research, will studies be done to help them? 3. Was the Krieger lead paint study like the Tuskegee Study?
4. What does the model of collaborative research with developing countries imply about licensing genetic versions of patented drugs for poor areas with HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis?
Explanation / Answer
2. Tuskegee Study was conducted in 1932 by public health service, their purpose of study is record natural history of syphilis in 600 black men. The study took place for about 40 years. Participants were told they will be treated from syphilis but they were not given proper treatmnet for syphilis, also they were informed about the original purpose of the study. Participants were died one by one by time. Therefore the study was not beneficial in terms of health. Thus frightened black men from participate in medical research therafter in Africa.
3. Krieger lead paint and Tuskegee studies had many similarities in terms of treatment and outcomes. Like Tuskegee study, Krieger lead paint study also exploited participants by its inadequate treatment. The purpose of the study was to report the health of lead paint in children but due to improper treatment as like Tuskegee study, Krieger lead paint also ended up with no benefits.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.