The 2009 movie, 2012 , caused a resurgence in popular interest (and in some case
ID: 1999153 • Letter: T
Question
The 2009 movie, 2012, caused a resurgence in popular interest (and in some cases, fear) about global disaster brought about by astronomical events. This was heightened by ready access to less-than-reliable information on the Internet.Find an example from popular culture in which real science (preferably astronomy-related, since this is an astronomy class) is misrepresented. This can be a movie, book, TV show, web site, etc. In your post, discuss the scientific inaccuracy in your example. Also, discuss how the inaccuracy is harmful (for example, does it cause people to be afraid for no reason? Or does it keep people from taking action that would be beneficial?)
Your initial post should be at least 200 words
The 2009 movie, 2012, caused a resurgence in popular interest (and in some cases, fear) about global disaster brought about by astronomical events. This was heightened by ready access to less-than-reliable information on the Internet.
Find an example from popular culture in which real science (preferably astronomy-related, since this is an astronomy class) is misrepresented. This can be a movie, book, TV show, web site, etc. In your post, discuss the scientific inaccuracy in your example. Also, discuss how the inaccuracy is harmful (for example, does it cause people to be afraid for no reason? Or does it keep people from taking action that would be beneficial?)
Your initial post should be at least 200 words
Find an example from popular culture in which real science (preferably astronomy-related, since this is an astronomy class) is misrepresented. This can be a movie, book, TV show, web site, etc. In your post, discuss the scientific inaccuracy in your example. Also, discuss how the inaccuracy is harmful (for example, does it cause people to be afraid for no reason? Or does it keep people from taking action that would be beneficial?)
Your initial post should be at least 200 words
Explanation / Answer
First one is in Sci-fi movies where the chief evading person evading the alien attacks run into the obstacle course the asteroid belt with thousands of asteroids separated by very small distance and the crew of the spaceship navigates through the dense forest with exceptional skills while the enemy ships collide with the rocks and are destroyed. Though it looks very exiciting but it is not true.Some information about asteroid tells that these belts are situated between 2.2 and 3.2 astronomical Units (AU) and they covers a humongous volume of 16 cubic AU (1 AU = 150 million kilometer). There are more than 100,000 asteroids with size more than 1 km but the average distance between them is several million kilometers. Most of the objects in the asteroid belt are of the size of dust grains, and even they are very sparse. The Pioneer spacecrafts were hit by only few micrometer sized particles.
Second one is wishing whilo looking at the broken star.This is a perfect example of what happens to half informed people in an argument who end up with their foot in the mouth. Although I appreciate the intention of debunking the superstition, it is wrong on so many levels that it's worse than the superstition itself.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.