Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

A curling stone of mass m is thrown with at initial velocity v, slows down and s

ID: 1545621 • Letter: A

Question

A curling stone of mass m is thrown with at initial velocity v, slows down and stops in the house. From the point of view of a player at rest the initial kinetic energy is mv2/2 and the final kinetic energy is 0. Thus the player concludes that the amount of energy dissipated through the ice friction is mv2/2. At the same time from the point of view of a player which slides in the direction opposite to the stone motion with the constant velocity v the initial velocity of the stone is 2v and the final velocity of the stone is v so the initial kinetic energy is m(2v) 2/2 = 2mv2 and the final kinetic energy is mv2/2. Thus the sliding player can conclude that the amount of energy dissipated through ice friction is 3mv2/2. Which conclusion is correct? Explain the origin and the size of the difference.

Explanation / Answer

The first conclusion is correct because in the first case the observer is at rest and hence only the KE of the curling stone is in consideration.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote