This question is based on the description of Longair in his book \"Theoretical C

Question

This question is based on the description of Longair in his book "Theoretical Concepts in Physics".

He starts by giving some provisions:

Then he defines:

He goes on to explain, that the principle of least action means, that an object moves on a path so that S is minimized.

Then he claims that this priciple is equal to Newton's 2nd law of motion, following through with a proof which is beyond my comprehension (which of course is my fault).

After I calculated S for a few examples, I am convinced, that this claim is correct only adding one additional provision (which Longair clearly does not state directly or indirectly):

The object moves on a path fixed in space. (Just the speeds at the points is allowed to differ.)

My argument for why this is necessary follows from a counterexample:

Since I cannot assume, that I found an error in Longair's standard book, can anyone please explain, what I got wrong.

Explanation / Answer

The general carelessness with the so-called "principle of least action" it that even in very good and reliable sources it is incorrectly stated that the action must be minimal. While the principle only requires that the action must be stationary, e.g. ?S=0.

So, more correctly, it should be called a "principle of stationary action". Concerning your example -- both of your trajectories are stationary, therefore both of them might be the true trajectory of your body.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.